Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

Peter - you are the consummate diplomat.

I think the head counts tally posted indicate the way most passionate Ric enthusiasts feel about the Arden guitar being the Holy Grail.

I'm not even that passionate about it, I am not particularly fond of 12 string electrics. I just have common sense.

Grey wrote:I think you misunderstand me. It's the first 12 string guitar Rickenbacker ever made, and the only 12 string to leave the factory with conventional string pairs. Wether it was the first electric 12 string guitar in the world is irrelevant to the signifigance in Rickenbacker history of the Arden guitar. It's like putting stickers and active pickups on a 1959 Les Paul and playing it in a punk rock band.

Now see here I disagree to me modding a 59 LP as you say to play in a punk band would not be as bad as you are doing so for a actual musical reason... vs doing something out of hero worship.. /ducks/

I think modding that Arden Rick was silly too. I would have left it as is and perhaps put another 360/12 set up like George's to show people the difference or something like that.

Then you have some history and perspective while still showing Beatle guitars.

But I am serious about my drums question, Josh. Ringo had gear too. Why aren't there drums in the Beatles Gear?

Well, I am still confused, but it's your money.

According to your website:

"Second was to search all over the world to find and acquire the rare vintage originals. Where originals were not viable, reissues and replica's were located and acquired."

So why not a replica 360/12C63? Those are available, meet the specifications of George's and still remain true to your website.

BuddyDog wrote: So why not a replica 360/12C63? Those are available, meet the specifications of George's and still remain true to your website.

"Man, that $40k was just burning a hole in my pocket..."

sloop_john_b wrote:

BuddyDog wrote: So why not a replica 360/12C63? Those are available, meet the specifications of George's and still remain true to your website.

"Man, that $40k was just burning a hole in my pocket..."

"...and I had the desire to alter history, as we knew it!"

Well maybe the altitude in Colorado Springs leads to hypoxic brain injury

Updates Made To Website and Facebook.

Well the images and description for the first instrument are pretty slim. There's only one small-sized photo of the actaul bass (covered in watermarks) followed up with a photo of McCartney with his bass.

For instruments of this provinence I would reccomended a thorough photoshoot with a professional photographer with some sensibly placed watermarks and high-resolution image downloads.

There is also a wealth of information about the instrument that needs to be expanded upon if the website is positioning itself as a definitive guide for gear used by The Beatles.

Budget's blown. Photos by Motorola Razr.

beatboy77 wrote:Updates Made To Website and Facebook.

Looks really great, Josh. Are you eventually going to individually have a photo of each guitar?

I'm glad you singled out the Hofner in the collection, this is my all time favorite instrument! Can you post more photos of the Hofner?

Those guys are doing a pretty good job, huh Ivan?

This is like the twilight zone! What on earth are you trying to protect so badly? Why show off your collection as tiny photos obscured by huge watermarks and copyright( ) notices?