And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
Captain Bob
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by Captain Bob »

Agreed. I'm not aware of a listing of the tensile for Pyramids, but having played around with them on occasion over the years, they are relatively high tension requiring a neck tweak. They are also a very stiff string to play.
I have never liked them.
1964 4001S Fireglo
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

aceonbass wrote:Stock 4003 rounds are 138lbs according to John Hall. I think the Kalium's (formerly Circle K) feel very similar, and have a similar tone too, which I like a lot.
That's weird, because I once tried to put a set of Ric strings on my main '72, which was wearing the 40-95 Rotos, and they immediately started pulling the neck forward so I took 'em straight off. And yet by those figures the Ric strings should be lower tension; it definitely wasn't the case.

If the Kaliums sound similar to Ric strings I probably won't like them. Ric strings sound far too polite to me.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6482
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by wints »

teeder wrote:Shaun,

I have my very first set of Roto's, ever, on my '67 and it sounds amazing! They certainly are high tension and did raise the action up a little. It's doesn't bother me, but I know you like it very low. It may be too much. IMO, you should be able to go to something in between like GHS Boomers, which are much less $'s than TI's.
That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.

Looking good Shaun. Should be a stunning bass when finished... :D
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6354
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by teeder »

teeder wrote:I'm pretty sure they're 40-95.
I was wrong, they're 45-100's, nickles! I love the tone, but maybe I should try the 40-95's.
That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.
It's a real sweetheart! I had been having some weird output loss / phase issues with the HS, so I put a Lollar re-wound '73 bridge pu in there and man does it sing through a little B-15 reissue!
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

wints wrote:
teeder wrote:Shaun,

I have my very first set of Roto's, ever, on my '67 and it sounds amazing! They certainly are high tension and did raise the action up a little. It's doesn't bother me, but I know you like it very low. It may be too much. IMO, you should be able to go to something in between like GHS Boomers, which are much less $'s than TI's.
That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.

Looking good Shaun. Should be a stunning bass when finished... :D
Thanks Andy. :)
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

teeder wrote:
teeder wrote:I'm pretty sure they're 40-95.
I was wrong, they're 45-100's, nickles! I love the tone, but maybe I should try the 40-95's.
That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.
It's a real sweetheart! I had been having some weird output loss / phase issues with the HS, so I put a Lollar re-wound '73 bridge pu in there and man does it sing through a little B-15 reissue!
A Roto 45 is pretty stiff - even a 40-100 set feels quite a bit stiffer than mine - so going down to 40-95 should make a fair difference. I'd be interested to see how you got on.

Glad to hear the bass is singing! :D
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6354
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by teeder »

Better that it sings instead of it's owner! :lol:
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

:lol:
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

In the meantime, the parts have arrived. These are just to give an idea of what it'll look like.

Image

Image

Image

Image

The guard's not mine; that's yet to be made, and should be somewhat more opaque, which is my preference; something like this:

Image
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1565
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by squirebass »

Very nice!!
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by Kopfjaeger »

Shaun,

Have you tried DR Sunbeams?? Really bright. I do prefer Kallium strings on most of my basses but I put a set of Medium DR Sunbeams on my 72 4001 and I'm in love with the tone. I first played DR's when I had Mark Walker's 1968 Mapleglo vacationing at my home. I fell in love with the tone.

Actually my 72 just arrived back from being refret and I'll be gigging her tomorrow night!

Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by berth »

I suppose I can buy this one as well once it is finished. ;-)
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

Kopfjaeger wrote:Shaun,

Have you tried DR Sunbeams?? Really bright. I do prefer Kallium strings on most of my basses but I put a set of Medium DR Sunbeams on my 72 4001 and I'm in love with the tone. I first played DR's when I had Mark Walker's 1968 Mapleglo vacationing at my home. I fell in love with the tone.

Actually my 72 just arrived back from being refret and I'll be gigging her tomorrow night!

Sepp
Haven't tried them Sepp, mainly because I'm not too comfortable with the gauges. May do at some point.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by henry5 »

berth wrote:I suppose I can buy this one as well once it is finished. ;-)

There's every chance Bert. I think you'll like the colour. :wink:
User avatar
songdog
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....

Post by songdog »

Love to see an old 4001 saved! I've been following this thread with interest.

Just out of curiosity, where are you all finding the tensions of different string sets? I'm using standard Rotosounds (RS66LD) on my '72 4001, have for years decades, haven't noticed any problems. Action is as low as I like it and the bridge isn't bottomed out, so I don't think it's developing negative neck angle. It would be interesting to know the tension on these strings.
Turn on, tune up, rock out!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”