And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- Captain Bob
- Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
- Contact:
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Agreed. I'm not aware of a listing of the tensile for Pyramids, but having played around with them on occasion over the years, they are relatively high tension requiring a neck tweak. They are also a very stiff string to play.
I have never liked them.
I have never liked them.
1964 4001S Fireglo
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
That's weird, because I once tried to put a set of Ric strings on my main '72, which was wearing the 40-95 Rotos, and they immediately started pulling the neck forward so I took 'em straight off. And yet by those figures the Ric strings should be lower tension; it definitely wasn't the case.aceonbass wrote:Stock 4003 rounds are 138lbs according to John Hall. I think the Kalium's (formerly Circle K) feel very similar, and have a similar tone too, which I like a lot.
If the Kaliums sound similar to Ric strings I probably won't like them. Ric strings sound far too polite to me.
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.teeder wrote:Shaun,
I have my very first set of Roto's, ever, on my '67 and it sounds amazing! They certainly are high tension and did raise the action up a little. It's doesn't bother me, but I know you like it very low. It may be too much. IMO, you should be able to go to something in between like GHS Boomers, which are much less $'s than TI's.
Looking good Shaun. Should be a stunning bass when finished...

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
I was wrong, they're 45-100's, nickles! I love the tone, but maybe I should try the 40-95's.teeder wrote:I'm pretty sure they're 40-95.
It's a real sweetheart! I had been having some weird output loss / phase issues with the HS, so I put a Lollar re-wound '73 bridge pu in there and man does it sing through a little B-15 reissue!That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Thanks Andy.wints wrote:That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.teeder wrote:Shaun,
I have my very first set of Roto's, ever, on my '67 and it sounds amazing! They certainly are high tension and did raise the action up a little. It's doesn't bother me, but I know you like it very low. It may be too much. IMO, you should be able to go to something in between like GHS Boomers, which are much less $'s than TI's.
Looking good Shaun. Should be a stunning bass when finished...

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
A Roto 45 is pretty stiff - even a 40-100 set feels quite a bit stiffer than mine - so going down to 40-95 should make a fair difference. I'd be interested to see how you got on.teeder wrote:I was wrong, they're 45-100's, nickles! I love the tone, but maybe I should try the 40-95's.teeder wrote:I'm pretty sure they're 40-95.
It's a real sweetheart! I had been having some weird output loss / phase issues with the HS, so I put a Lollar re-wound '73 bridge pu in there and man does it sing through a little B-15 reissue!That's one of the most stable necks I've come across Kev. Fabulous action that reminds me of the Gibb bass.
Glad to hear the bass is singing!

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Better that it sings instead of it's owner! 

- squirebass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Very nice!!
- Kopfjaeger
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Shaun,
Have you tried DR Sunbeams?? Really bright. I do prefer Kallium strings on most of my basses but I put a set of Medium DR Sunbeams on my 72 4001 and I'm in love with the tone. I first played DR's when I had Mark Walker's 1968 Mapleglo vacationing at my home. I fell in love with the tone.
Actually my 72 just arrived back from being refret and I'll be gigging her tomorrow night!
Sepp
Have you tried DR Sunbeams?? Really bright. I do prefer Kallium strings on most of my basses but I put a set of Medium DR Sunbeams on my 72 4001 and I'm in love with the tone. I first played DR's when I had Mark Walker's 1968 Mapleglo vacationing at my home. I fell in love with the tone.
Actually my 72 just arrived back from being refret and I'll be gigging her tomorrow night!
Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
I suppose I can buy this one as well once it is finished. 

68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Haven't tried them Sepp, mainly because I'm not too comfortable with the gauges. May do at some point.Kopfjaeger wrote:Shaun,
Have you tried DR Sunbeams?? Really bright. I do prefer Kallium strings on most of my basses but I put a set of Medium DR Sunbeams on my 72 4001 and I'm in love with the tone. I first played DR's when I had Mark Walker's 1968 Mapleglo vacationing at my home. I fell in love with the tone.
Actually my 72 just arrived back from being refret and I'll be gigging her tomorrow night!
Sepp
Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
berth wrote:I suppose I can buy this one as well once it is finished.
There's every chance Bert. I think you'll like the colour.

Re: And another 1968 4001 resurrection.....
Love to see an old 4001 saved! I've been following this thread with interest.
Just out of curiosity, where are you all finding the tensions of different string sets? I'm using standard Rotosounds (RS66LD) on my '72 4001, have foryears decades, haven't noticed any problems. Action is as low as I like it and the bridge isn't bottomed out, so I don't think it's developing negative neck angle. It would be interesting to know the tension on these strings.
Just out of curiosity, where are you all finding the tensions of different string sets? I'm using standard Rotosounds (RS66LD) on my '72 4001, have for
Turn on, tune up, rock out!