Page 60 of 69
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:45 pm
by cjj
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:19 pm
by lyle_from_minneapolis
Okay, I know this is not the right place for this...but it occurs to me that a car like this would provoke one of two responses, thumbs up or thumbs down. I for one think it's beautiful. The Cramer Comet:

Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:44 pm
by jingle_jangle
That's a disproportionate, amateurish, low-budget version of this classic GM Motorama show car, the Buick LeSabre:
And the difference between the two is subtle. But it's where the difference between, "(sort of) nice try", and "grand slam", to shamelessly mix a metaphor.
My offhand guess is that the Comet was "styled" to fit an existing chassis, and no drawings exist--it looks like the builder winged it.
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:37 pm
by jps
jingle_jangle wrote:
And the difference between the two is subtle.
I don't think the differences are subtle at all. Just about every detail is different with the GM being far more elegant, not clumsy looking like the Cramer Comet.

Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:12 pm
by jingle_jangle
To you and me and many others, not subtle. To others, it's, "what's the difference?"
But, yes, I agree with your every word. Comparisons of these two photos do an excellent job of underscoring the difference between amateur enthusiast and trained professional team. Aside from those differences, there are quite secondary considerations of budget.
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:13 pm
by lyle_from_minneapolis
Huge difference to me. The Comet just lost its luster. What a gorgeous car, that Le Sabre!
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:34 pm
by johnallg
That Comet reminds me of the kiddie pedal cars decades ago.
Re: Knock-Offs, Rip-Offs, and Just Plain UGLY!
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:05 am
by string_along

Man! Some pretty raunchy and barfy guitars I've seen on this thread.

(but a cool

thread to be sure!)
Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 1:58 pm
by octagon
Fender Custom Shop Limited Edition Moto Set - moto encrusted stratocaster, blues deluxe amp and flight case.

Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:01 pm
by jingle_jangle
Tasteless!
Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:05 pm
by marc61
I try to like Fender stuff. I really do. Right now, I use Pbass exclusively, but besides tasteless, this seems useless.
Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:15 pm
by paologregorio
jingle_jangle wrote:Tasteless!
LOL! I don't care about the amp or case (all of that MOTO seems quite useless on an amp and case, and quite susceptible to some serious damage were they to be regularly used), but I love the guitar; it's quite similar to my custom Moto Bigsby Thinline Tele:
Since that photo was taken, I've installed a JM/Jag bridge cover, and plan on sending the hot/tapped neck p/up back to Seymour Duncan to have it potted and the chrome cover installed. A regular Tele chrome cover doesn't fit because of the extra windings.
I actually bid on one of those MOTO Strat once on EBay, but I figured out it was a scam, so no go.
A Litghtshow version would be really cool... all sorts of colored lights lighting up the MOTO from behind, if the MOTO were translucent and thin enough.
Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:16 pm
by cjj
Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:38 pm
by octagon
jingle_jangle wrote:Tasteless!
You rang?

Re: Forum Members Must Wash Hands After Viewing
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:46 pm
by Scastles
A Fender camouflaged grouping. Who woulda thought?