Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:36 pm
Imagine if we were back in 1955....Yes, No basses Jps.....Sad era for Bass players.jps wrote:No basses!wim wrote:...bring me back to 1955
Tadaa! everything still available.
Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Dear John Hall
Page 7 of 10
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:59 pm
There were basses, just no Rickenbacker basses.
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:22 pm
Imagine if we were back in 1955....Yes, No......... Jps...Casiraghi22 wrote:Imagine if we were back in 1955....Yes, No basses Jps.....Sad era for Bass players.jps wrote:No basses!wim wrote:...bring me back to 1955
Tadaa! everything still available
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:40 pm
That, too! 
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:35 pm
cjj wrote:Imagine if we were back in 1955....Yes, No......... Jps...Casiraghi22 wrote:Imagine if we were back in 1955....Yes, No basses Jps.....Sad era for Bass players.jps wrote: No basses!
Well, hey, I've gotta admit, most people probably wouldn't want to spend a lot of time trying to converse with me in 1955 either...jps wrote:That, too!
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:36 pm
Yeah, I'm pretty sure (and absolutely sure in my case) it's just bustin' Jeff's chops...rickenbrother wrote:Jeff isn't speechless, he just wants everyone to stare at that period.
Odd use of smilies, I hope you guys are just breaking Jeff's chops.
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:12 am
External image removed by Gil as it contains a malicious content on the image (Trojan horse).
I wouldn't get too excited about this - it's more than likely that it won't work on any modern browser (from the past few years) as they should not execute javascript from within images...
I wouldn't get too excited about this - it's more than likely that it won't work on any modern browser (from the past few years) as they should not execute javascript from within images...
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:18 am
Sigh...
You give an inch and they demand a mile...
You give an inch and they demand a mile...
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:04 am
Kenny, I think that kind of language is against forum rules here. 
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:21 am
Ok,
Stupid question, but what else would you expect?
Are the TRANS colors available on the 4004's just a regular RED OR BLUE paint just sprayed lightly or is there a special color that goes on underneath like the RUBY gets a silver treatment, or is it a different color completely?
I'm just curious. I kinda dig the RUBY color, it really pops with the white trim on a 4003, but could the same color be sprayed TRANS RUBY or is that a horse of a different color?
Ok, back to the prayers!
Stupid question, but what else would you expect?
Are the TRANS colors available on the 4004's just a regular RED OR BLUE paint just sprayed lightly or is there a special color that goes on underneath like the RUBY gets a silver treatment, or is it a different color completely?
I'm just curious. I kinda dig the RUBY color, it really pops with the white trim on a 4003, but could the same color be sprayed TRANS RUBY or is that a horse of a different color?
Ok, back to the prayers!
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:29 pm
Trans colors, also known as tints or candys, are different than solid colors. I wish the trans colors were avaiable on models other than 650's&4004's.
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:19 pm
egosheep wrote:Kenny, I think that kind of language is against forum rules here.
Yeah you can't say God or sucks. I know a place where you can though!
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:25 pm
You also couldn't say WTF here either- despite the fact that the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the London Times, Newsweek, Atlantic Weekly, Time magazine, and The Wall Street Journal have embraced it as acceptable common usage.
However, it's now been "approved" here for all to use, after I got a bit PO'ed about it.
WTF? indeed.
However, it's now been "approved" here for all to use, after I got a bit PO'ed about it.
WTF? indeed.
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:31 pm
Hey John, just a bit of advice, you might want to be careful questioning the rules of the forum. I did once and got a very stern warning. I wouldn't want to see you get banned.
Re: Dear John Hall
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:13 pm
sloop_john_b wrote:Hey John, just a bit of advice, you might want to be careful questioning the rules of the forum. I did once and got a very stern warning. I wouldn't want to see you get banned.