Re: Getting a Vintage Rickenbacker Bass restored ?
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 7:31 am
That's beautiful, Graham!
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Slotted or domed poles on it Kevin, I can't tell. Stunning, really!!teeder wrote:
Sepp, Tony pretty much nailed it. That's an earlier '73 HG that I bought off ebay years ago. It wasn't working when I got it so I had it rewound by Lollar. I stripped the black paint off because it was mostly off anyway. The horseshoe wasn't playing nice with the toaster and I couldn't get a even string response out of it so I swapped it out.
Brian, Thanks for adding DA09 to the Register - just two things, the colour is currenly a dark green not jetglo and also, who is Peter so I can PM him and claim the entry.Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:Happy to help... And I too will follow its restoration with great interest.bassslug wrote: Question for Brian, was 1964 the first year the 4001s was made? also you mentioned mine was the earliest currently known about on RRF will it be added to the register that you directed me too?
Thanks again everyone for all the advice
Donal
I added your bass to the RRF Register as a collected item. (I am OCD when it comes to adding data to it).
You can claim the entry by sending a PM to Peter (ADMIN).
http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... lebrity%3D
Thanks! It looks a little bright from that sunshine. We're not used to having the sun out around here!Slotted or domed poles on it Kevin, I can't tell. Stunning, really!!
Look at who posted three before you posted this post. That is Peter, one of our fave Admins.bassslug wrote:Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:bassslug wrote: Question who is Peter so I can PM him and claim the entry.
Awesome!! Same bobbin that debut in 1968 first on the horsie then with the stip magnet, although I think RIC used the small/narrow magnet initially. I had the same pup on my early 1973 4001. Loved that bass!!teeder wrote:Thanks! It looks a little bright from that sunshine. We're not used to having the sun out around here!Slotted or domed poles on it Kevin, I can't tell. Stunning, really!!![]()
Slotted poles, large magnet. Wound to 8.5k. It's killer!
Peter McCormack - he is the ADMIN on the RRF. He responded above commenting on Graham's bass.bassslug wrote:
Brian, Thanks for adding DA09 to the Register - just two things, the colour is currenly a dark green not jetglo and also, who is Peter so I can PM him and claim the entry.
Many Thanks
Donal
Graham,8mileshigh wrote:Yep. CM118.
I feel in my bones that this was made for McCartney.....Shall I keep dreaming? LOL
Brian, you might be right on the colour as the inside is totally sprayed, if we ever get some sunlight over here I'll take her outside and see, I have some higher quality imagine which I sent to LD so I'll post one in a minute so you can see it.Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:Peter McCormack - he is the ADMIN on the RRF. He responded above commenting on Graham's bass.bassslug wrote:
Brian, Thanks for adding DA09 to the Register - just two things, the colour is currenly a dark green not jetglo and also, who is Peter so I can PM him and claim the entry.
Many Thanks
Donal
I will take your word on the colour of your bass - but it looks Jetglo from the picture.![]()
Jetglo (as the clearcoat on them ambers) slowly turns green over the years. Again it suggests (to me at least) that the finish has been on your bass for a very long time. Jetglo is very rare in 1964 - but it was a an available finish choice.
Best way to get a sense of the colour is to shoot it outside in the sunlight. I don't think Dark green is a finish option in the data base.
There is always the Radio-Tel doc sheet from around 24 January '64 for McCartney's bass, stating in the description (along with the DA 23 number) saying it is "left handed".....opticnerve wrote:Since the neck pickup rout was done later & the control cavity was enlarged to fit 4 pots, I wonder if the husk of that bass is even earlier than '62?leftybass wrote:For years I have always thought the 'missing link' between the two styles is pictured in the Rittor book--labeled a '63 4001 but showing evidence of an earlier build (like '62), routs after being finished, extra screw holes with nothing to show for them, large '62 peghead and tuners etc...
Maybe it's leftover from an older batch that possibly included Vincent's '61 & the single pickup Deluxe in the Smith book?
This is a very murky period for Ric Basses. It's fun playing the sleuth & trying to connect the dots.
I suppose catalogs don't exist from '61 to '63? I've never seen any.
I believe that is correct Graham. I've heard that for some reason, instead of just making a new bass for Paul, all the parts from the8mileshigh wrote:Here's my 63. Didn't they make one for McCartney before the knew he was left handed? ............
righty bass (including the jack plate) were fitted to the new lefty body. Strange...
Very cool '63 bass Graham! Is it a late '63?
leftybass wrote: There is always the Radio-Tel doc sheet from around 24 January '64 for McCartney's bass, stating in the description (along with the DA 23 number) saying it is "left handed".....