Re: New basses
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:40 pm
Like on that ric video posted the low B has so many overtones it sounds like it could be one of three notes. Not enough fundamental to make out a lone, clear B note.
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mVM-E33ThUlumgimfong wrote:Like on that ric video posted the low B has so many overtones it sounds like it could be one of three notes. Not enough fundamental to make out a lone, clear B note.
I'm surprised folks are reacting negatively to this. The bass has a great sound and that may be the healthiest sounding Ric neck pickup ever. The recording quality is not great, but you can tell it's got a really strong presence. (Sometimes the 4003 neck pickup just seems to wimp out when you try to balance it against the bridge pickup, though this doesn't always happen.) The B string is buzzing a little, but it also seems like it's being picked pretty hard too. I wouldn't be surprised if that is a thinner gauge. But you want a bit of "flop" or it won't resonate properly, at least for fingerstyle.jps wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7OoH2cwYMUcassius987 wrote:I never heard any of the demo players actually touch the B string... Do you have a link to that?
Grey wrote:
RIC has their comfort zone, hell that might as well be the company motto. I think it takes some balls to really try pushing something new out there that respects where the brand came from but looks twords the future, and as a younger player I know for a fact that many people have longed for those classic Rickenbacker looks with modern features. Like a bridge that isn't such a pain, or a gigantic chrome plate on the body that 99% of players take the cover off of anyway. This looks like a real, genuine effort to create a bass for the current era. Just the fact that people are actually talking about it says a lot, and I think the 5-string layout, wider neck, and modern hardware matched with RIC's classic styling is a clear step in the right direction.
Kudos to Ben & Co.
From what I have seen, some of those specs from WW are inaccurate, such as the "35" scale length".cassius987 wrote:A couple are available at Wildwood. https://wildwoodguitars.com/product-cat ... electrics/
Relatively lightweight, 35'' scale, 1.8'' nut! Nice!
Interesting. Here's what they say about it on the site:jps wrote:From what I have seen, some of those specs from WW are inaccurate, such as the "35" scale length".cassius987 wrote:A couple are available at Wildwood. https://wildwoodguitars.com/product-cat ... electrics/
Relatively lightweight, 35'' scale, 1.8'' nut! Nice!
I like how my B string sounds on my 4003/5 (a lot, now that it's a Hi-Beam), but that said, I am excited at the possibility of a 35'' Ric. More choices are always a good thing.So, what's different apart from the extra string? Having a low B string to bring an extra dose of thunder is nice, but this 4003S/5 has plenty of other enticing appointments, the most delightful of which is its longer scale length.
Most Rickenbacker basses have a 33-1/4" scale length, which is an inch shorter than a typical electric bass. So, most Ricky four-strings have a percussive attack (the classic Chris Squire clank) that blooms into a rich, midrange-forward sound.
The longer scale gives this bass more string tension, which leads to a rounder, more piano-like attack. You still get that classic Rickenbacker punch, but with a slightly thumpier attack. It's a different flavor than normal, and it is quite an inspiring sound!
I took a class on the history of Gospel years ago and the rhythm sections, bass players, are freaking killer...cassius987 wrote: If you listen to enough gospel music it's difficult to not get a bad case of GAS for a good B string.