Page 1 of 2
Vintage
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:50 pm
by ken_swearingen
when i see the word vintage i tend to get excited-then when i find out there referring to a 76 4001 i tend to loose that exctement -am i just getting older is 1976 a vintage year-i see vintage all over ebay is something that hasn't changed much in 30 years vintage?
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:19 pm
by rickaddict
I think so. It may not have the checkered binding or full width inlays, but I'd still call it a vintage Rick. I think its technically considered an antique if its 25 years old.
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:34 pm
by jwr2
vintage = year or period of origin ... from Websters dictionary ...
I have 2 rics of 2002 vintage ... 1 1998 ... 2 1993 ... 1 1990 ... 1 1986 ...
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:35 am
by marc61
Interesting, Jeff is right, any older Ric, since they are dated is from that vintage. Like wine I suppose.
Generally from being in the collectibles business, I would tell customers it takes a generation to see if it has real collector's value.
Chris Pappas can correct me, but I believe, technically, an antique is over 100 years old, but the term is used loosely by some on newer goods. I guess you could say that about the term vintage as well.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:55 am
by bottom4
In the 70's & 80's we were calling 50's and 60's stuff (respectively) vintage... So by that standard, 70’s stuff in 05…
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 2:11 am
by heinpete
... originally the term "vintage" might have meant a very typical sound or make of an older instrument...
...nowadays it is used to increase business and sales...
...some dumb collectors buy anything with that term, that definitely underwent some "inflation"like everything will, that is (ab-)used for business.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 4:55 am
by henry5
I think Jeff is more or less right; I believe "vintage" is the term used to describe something more then 25 years old (at least it is in car terms, so I believe). I have the same problem though, a 78 Rick just isn't vintage to me!
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:11 am
by rictified
I think it's a relative term, to someone 24 years old a 70's bass is probably vintage, to me it's something I bought brand new when I was 24. But I do see 70's 4001's rapidly becoming collectors items. Look what happened to CBS Fenders especially 70's, when they were new they were known as THE basses to avoid. Now they're vintage??
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:30 am
by rickenbrother
Bob. I agree with you about '70's Fenders. I can't believe what the value on those mediocre basses is.
It seems that Ed Roman is already considering these as vintage.

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:35 am
by rictified
Yeah, 2004 vintage.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:13 am
by henny
lol
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:51 am
by wints
That is without doubt one of the best (if not the best)contemporary looking basses being produced today. Instantly coveted and collectible. Vintage!
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:07 am
by simer4001
Vintage isn't the word that bothers me in descriptions of items. It is the word "Mint". I honestly hsve problems with the very loose definition of "Mint".
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:54 am
by rictified
I really hate "minty" it grates on my nerves.
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 8:37 am
by jwr2
The one that bugs me is "Beyond Mint" ...
How do you get better than mint?