Page 1 of 3
Looking for low-interest, long term loan
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:36 pm
by shinynewtoy
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:06 am
by rob
Ummm....Yeah, right. Let me dig deeper in my pockets and deeper between the couch couchions for some more spare change.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:14 am
by Scastles
And to think no one has bid on it yet.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:01 am
by atomic_punk
I love the guy who is asking him to pick up the $150 shipping, and is asking on a 650,000 guitar. Hilarious!!
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:56 am
by jingle_jangle
I thought it was $695K. Oh well, what's $45K where $150 in shipping is concerned!
Considering that "Blackie" brought $1million plus, this price seems to be right in line with the rest of the insanity out there.
You other guys in the Forum who own "celebrity" guitars:
Does it help your playing to have so-called "mojo" in your hands? Mine (sadly) didn't make one bit of difference...
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:04 am
by rob
Have you noticed that the wear marks on the finish in the pics with Jimi are not present in the pics of the actual guitar? It could've been refinished, but why do that on Jimi's guitar? Wouldn't those wear marks prove the authenticity? I think I smell a scam, or is it just me?
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:07 am
by rictified
Where are the burn marks?
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:59 am
by iamthebassman
Robert, I was noticing the same thing.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:56 am
by wints
Like anything this valuble the real dealing is all done behind the scenes. E Bay is the vehicle here for a greater worldwide audience. If it is the genuine article, I think the asking price could well be met.
As Steve says, the shipping deal is just too funny..
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:04 am
by Scastles
According to what the seller wrote in his spiel, the edges of the guitar were 'blacked in' by a pen or such which would explain why the wear marks aren't visible. Hard to tell by the pics but it could be.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:58 am
by rob
Not that I have almost a million dollars to blow, but I still say this is kinda fishy. Normally, a guitar like this, if it is in fact once owned by Hendrix, probably wouldn't be on an internet auction site. An item like this would normally be sold at a private auction, were bidders can see it in person. That's what I'm thinking.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:01 am
by ozover50
I was thinking along the same lines, Rob. Normally something like that would be saved for a Christies or Sothebys auction, IMO. The speil goes heavily into the sellers' credentials - if they had them serious collectors (ones with that kind of dosh) would be aware of them (IMO again!).
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:36 am
by kevin
Pen fill-ins aside, that doesn't look like the same guitar as shown in the color pic of Jimi playing. The dark part of the 'burst appears to be thicker in the old photo. At least that's what my eyes are telling me.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:02 pm
by rob
Kevin, your eyes are probably telling you right. BY ALL MEANS, DON"T BID!!!

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:05 pm
by rob
BTW, I just noticed something. Would you buy this "Rare Collectible" from a guy who's also selling a Gibson SG Mousepad? HA!