Page 1 of 1
A little misleading, no?
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:22 am
by marc61
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:27 am
by edski
No, just seems to be the stock RIC c64 picture. I love when folks jsut cut and paste the sales pitch from a manufacturers site...
Nice looking bass, however misleading the sales pitch.
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:34 am
by rictified
They're doing it on purpose too because they have a picture of a 4003 in the little pictures down below.
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:37 am
by edski
Agreed, but the 4003 pics appear to be the actual bass, not a stock pic from the Ric site.
Purposely misleading eBay auctions? My world has just been shattered. Next I'm going to find out my 1975 4001 is an Ibanez clone!
OK, back into reality! Whew!
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:52 am
by ken_swearingen
Definitely messed up another one of those it looks just like McCartney's ,idiot.Just because its mapleglo,preying on the ignorant.
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:46 pm
by doctorwho
I agree that it is a misleading ad. With good pictures of the real guitar for sale, there is not one honest reason for the seller to have that incorrect picture in there.
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:50 pm
by jps
Our own Lawton Higgs posted a misleading auction, read all about it in the Forum section!
