Page 1 of 1
Split Bridge
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:27 pm
by mikmik
My old 4000 had one of these. But my 4001 doesn't. What is the story here?
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:50 am
by bassman
4000 and 4001 models had the split tailpiece until approx May-June of 1973. After that the current non-split tailpiece design became the standard.
It was one of the components that was changed in the design by RIC during "The Transition Year 1973".
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:16 am
by david_schwab
I always wondered what the split was for.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:33 am
by marty
"I always wondered what the split was for."
Good point David.
What's the significance, if any of the split?
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:19 am
by rickengeezer
I always assumed that it was cosmetic, to mirror the "split" that the original horseshoes had. Once they went to the solid pickup cover, there was no point in keeping the split.
Of course, I am making this up, but it sounds plausible.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:29 am
by wints
The old mute baseplates are actually split in the middle. Two seperate pieces although the mute was one solid piece. This may be the answer...
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:16 am
by jnbass
I kinda like the split look...

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:34 am
by david_schwab
Jared, that's called a "diastema." My wife has one of those... looks sexy on her!

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:24 pm
by jnbass
diastema?
ok
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:58 am
by david_schwab
Yep, diastema.
