Page 1 of 1

I may have GAS for a c64

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 3:39 am
by marc61
I think I have a beat on a c64 in Jetglo.

hmmmmm.....

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:47 am
by jnbass
do it!

and forget about refinishing the 4000 ;)

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:52 am
by marc61
Actually, I may do it because you guys made me feel guilty about the 4000.

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:09 am
by thx1955
I'm looking for a Fireglo one ...

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:10 am
by bottom4
I would get a nice Jetglo 4003S or 4001S but I don’t think I would be able to cover-up those walnut wings on the C64.

Just something more to think about Marc Image

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:30 am
by lowendbob
That's why MapleGlow is the only way to go on the C64's. The natural walnut looks so beautiful.
Yes, that's right Jim. I said MapleGlow! Image
Image
Image

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:34 am
by thx1955
Looks naked to me .....it's nice though, how does it play compared to the c64 ??

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:58 pm
by marc67
Go for it, Marc!
When I got my C64 (MG) there was one Jetglo for sale and although I was so fixed on a MG, I found there was something very special about a JG C64 (and V63 too - do you still have it?)

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:33 pm
by marc61
I don't have the v63, although it's still in the forum. Was thinking the c64 might be a good substitute.

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:51 pm
by lowendbob
Jim, I love the C64S much nicer that the C64.
Can't beat the satin finish, and I've come to appreciate the zero fret. Very nice neck also.

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 4:06 pm
by marc61
Ahhh...I had old information. No JG 4001c64's around

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:07 pm
by ken_swearingen
Jim Rhodes had one [Rhodes music]Bob,i couldn't agree more about the satin finish.