Page 1 of 2

Horseshoe Sacrilege?

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:32 pm
by seth_lorinczi
Just got this April '73 beaut back from the refin shop. I had a reissue horseshoe lying around so I popped that in; it sounds and looks great (though it has a MUCH higher output than the toaster).

My question is: Is it "wrong" to fiddle with vintage instruments? On the one hand, it's reasonable to make an instrument exactly as you want it, both cosmetically and functionally. On the other, why not alter a newer, less valuable instrument and leave the older ones alone? And does the knowledge that your instrument is vintage change the way you play and your enjoyment of it?

Broad, vague questions, I know. I'm trying to answer them in the context of my own buying/selling habits and I'm curious what others think.Image

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:39 pm
by thx1955
If you've "another" reissue horseshoe laying around I'd put it in here
Image

My June 72 looking naked without her cover !!!

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:40 pm
by rictified
As long as it's a reversable mod I see no problem with modifying them. Just my opinion. Although I think they look better with their original high gains.

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:41 pm
by shinynewtoy
My quick take..

If you have a bass that you love (or just one that looks like THAT one!) I'd want to make sure that it was set up in a way that made me want to pick it up and play it as much as possible. More care and reverence when playing it, sure, but I'd play it as much as I could.

Would a rare, vintage instrument see alot of gigs or practices? Not likely. Would I do anything irreversible? Only if it was modded already, and even then any alterations would be minor. (You won't be seeing me attack it with a router!)

I guess you can look at it a couple of different ways, and it truly depends on the instrument, but I for one see nothing wrong with a couple of mods that make your bass that much better for YOU.

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:42 pm
by beatlefan
Looks great, Seth!! It's your bass, fella. You haven't damaged it with non-reversable mods, so .... don't worry....be HAPPY!!

Sorry....I couldn't stop it....

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:06 pm
by bassman
I don't think there's anything wrong in swapping out a pickup. I did it myself five years ago when the bridge p/u on my April 73 4001 died. Rather than repair it, I replaced it with a new factory horseshoe p/u. I didn't change the surround or make any modifications to the bass itself. I didn't want to put the v63 horseshoe surround on my bass and the horseshoe p/u dropped right in without the need for any modification.

Everything else on the bass is factory original. I did bypass the .0047 cap when I installed the horseshoe. But that can be undone in less than 5 minutes if I want to change it back.

As long as one doesn't misrepresent what the instrument is, I think it's ok.

Here's my 73 as she is today.

Image

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:27 pm
by lowendbob
Hmm, what you think Jeff Rath's take is on this? Image

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 4:28 pm
by thx1955
Nice bass Jon, once again I'm happy you decided to keep her !!

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:15 pm
by ken_swearingen
I'm not Jon,sell it to me[beauty]anyway Seth,these old Ric basses can sit around and collect dust or we can play them [carefully of course]as long as the mod ,as Bob said is reversible why not,they were meant to be played and enjoyed.

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:30 pm
by seth_lorinczi
I guess so. And thanks for the thoughts. I know that having it refinished in the first place is a modification. But how far do you go with that line of thinking? I'm not saying it's crucial that everything be stock; I just wonder if it's a misrepresentation, and if so how wrong is that (other than in the context of buying or selling it, of course).

For instance, what if I decided that I liked the lucite tug bars and added one to this bass. Were it a year or so older, it would have one, but otherwise be pretty much the same. (I don't think I'm going to be doing that particular mod anytime soon.) Would it be wrong? Or would it just SEEM so wrong as to preclude any of us doing it? Again, exploring the rhetorical here.

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:33 pm
by jwr2
When I used to gig with my old 1968 4001 the 60's pickups were too underwound and weak for me so I put high gains in and removed the bass cut capaciter ... if I didn't switch to 5 strings then I would still use that bass with the high gains ... it rocked ... but I restored it when I sold it ...

Image

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:42 pm
by charlyg
Now that's gorgeous!

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:46 pm
by atomic_punk
THAT's what the V68 should look like, right there.

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:10 pm
by ken_swearingen
Seth,by putting a vintage part on a period correct vintage instrument in my opinion is not a mod but an option that either could or could not have been original.[in other word put the finger rest on]

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:07 am
by teeder
"When" RIC starts making the V68's, Mr. Hall should make posters of Jeff's bass, and put them up in every department!