My new 360/12, good work, Mr. Hall
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:08 am
I had a 360/12 I bought in the mid 80s. I should've never let it go -- I've been missing it ever since I sold it in the early 90s. That said, I finally got around to replacing it in my arsenal last weekend.
Considering the somewhat glacial pace Rickenbacker moves at in regards to changing existing designs (why screw with an industry standard?) I was very, very impressed with the subtle changes that have been incorporated in the last 20 years.
First, that the slots in the head stock go all the way through -- can I please just say "FINALLY!" It's so much easier to string. What surprises me more, though, is how much more stable the tuning is than on my old Rick. Both my older Rick and my current early 60s Vox Phantom XII were in need of constant adjustment. Not so with this new 360.
I was also impressed with the level of finish. My old Rick was no slouch -- but the finish on this new one (in mapleglo) is absolutely flawless. It seems to me that the finish on the fingerboard is less thick than it used to be, resulting in a much more playable instrument in the higher frets.
Anyhow, I just wanted to pass along a thanks to Mr. Hall. In a time when it seems that you almost HAVE to get a vintage instrument to find quality from other manufacturers, his stewardship of RIC is to be commended. And then when you consider what other American-made guitars cost, it just boggles the mind how affordable these things are. Well, relatively speaking, at least. I mean, RIC could probably double their prices while still increasing profits -- sure, a lot of people would be priced out, but I'd bet more than half would suck it up and pay the extra money for that unmistakable, irreplaceable tone. It says a lot about Mr. Hall that his dedication is to musicians and collectors, not to the bottom line, that the pricing structure remains where it is. My new 360/12 barely cost more than the one I bought 20 years ago. That is just profound to me.
I couldn't be happier. I've already arranged two songs on this thing and I can't wait to start rolling some tape.
Thanks.
Considering the somewhat glacial pace Rickenbacker moves at in regards to changing existing designs (why screw with an industry standard?) I was very, very impressed with the subtle changes that have been incorporated in the last 20 years.
First, that the slots in the head stock go all the way through -- can I please just say "FINALLY!" It's so much easier to string. What surprises me more, though, is how much more stable the tuning is than on my old Rick. Both my older Rick and my current early 60s Vox Phantom XII were in need of constant adjustment. Not so with this new 360.
I was also impressed with the level of finish. My old Rick was no slouch -- but the finish on this new one (in mapleglo) is absolutely flawless. It seems to me that the finish on the fingerboard is less thick than it used to be, resulting in a much more playable instrument in the higher frets.
Anyhow, I just wanted to pass along a thanks to Mr. Hall. In a time when it seems that you almost HAVE to get a vintage instrument to find quality from other manufacturers, his stewardship of RIC is to be commended. And then when you consider what other American-made guitars cost, it just boggles the mind how affordable these things are. Well, relatively speaking, at least. I mean, RIC could probably double their prices while still increasing profits -- sure, a lot of people would be priced out, but I'd bet more than half would suck it up and pay the extra money for that unmistakable, irreplaceable tone. It says a lot about Mr. Hall that his dedication is to musicians and collectors, not to the bottom line, that the pricing structure remains where it is. My new 360/12 barely cost more than the one I bought 20 years ago. That is just profound to me.
I couldn't be happier. I've already arranged two songs on this thing and I can't wait to start rolling some tape.
Thanks.
