Page 1 of 1
Frank Allen
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2000 6:14 pm
by RJHC
_EVEN THOUGH CHRIS , TONY , MIKE , AND JOHN
CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL SEARCHERS , I REGARD
FRANK AS SEMI-ORIGINAL BECAUSE HE CAME IN WHEN
THE THEY WERE STILL HAVING HITS .
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2000 7:55 pm
by admin
Based on his relatively early introduction to The Searchers in August 1964 I have come to regard Frank Allen as an original member. I realize that I may be stretching the originality issue slightly. Next to John McNally, however, he is the longest serving member of The Searchers and you cannot deny his outstanding commitment and talent that has spanned 36 years.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2000 10:55 pm
by jjr
I first saw Frank with the Searchers at the Brooklyn Fox, Labor Day, 1964 at a "Murray the K" Rock n' Roll show. Since they only hit the States that Spring, and I had only seen Tony Jackson on the Sullivan show, with 2 songs he didn't sing lead on, I've always thought of Frank as a near original. That was when they had those matching blue and white guitars that looked like they had buffalo horns on them. He's been with the band everytime I've seen them since then, so to put it in mob terms, he's "made".
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2000 5:51 am
by tim
Frank Allen debuted on "When You Walk In The Room" on which he sang lead vocal alongside Mike Pender (although Mike Pender is more prominent in the mix). He has acted as 'frontman' at live shows ever since the late 60s and is a 'master' at working an audience.
'Original' is an emotive word. There were other members of The Searchers before they became famous - Norman McGarry (replaced by Chris Curtis) and 'Big Ron' - would anybody classify them as 'original members'? (And what about Johnny Sandon?).
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2001 1:15 pm
by mdenger
I think the groups ows very much to Frank - without him - I think - the group wouldn't exist anymore. John might be the boss - but for hte way the Searchers have to earn their money - Frank is perfect.
Michael
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
by royclough
Does it matter if Frank was a original or not. The fact is he has been with the Searchers for nearly 37 years, only John has been in the band longer.
Would Brian Bennett be classed as a non original of The Shadows, his name is as synonymous with them as Frank Allen's is with the Searchers.
The vast majority of Searchers audiences could not care less, only "Die Hards" and sad people(I include myself some what) want to debate this issue.
The Searchers name overall was and still is more important than individual band members, although clearly to have credence some of the personnel must in my view have a connection to the glory days. Spencer James has been in the band 15 years, a fact often overlooked.
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2001 5:41 pm
by alancheshire
Well put, Roy. I entirely agree with you. The music comes first.
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2001 9:22 pm
by anon
If there was a battle of the basses, which Searcher, Tony or Frank would be considered the better bass player? My vote is for Frank!
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2001 9:57 pm
by admin
Anon: I am with you but I suppose who you like depends on the style of music that you prefer. Frank has hand a kind of slap bass style which I gather has been difficult to record for some sound engineers. I really enjoy Frank's style and enjoy his bass runs and fills. Tony, to my ears, had a more "booming in your face" bass style that was less subtle than Frank's style and for some rockers provided for an electrifying and very exciting performance. Sadly, Tony did not stay around too long and so for me it is difficult to make a fair comparison.
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2001 5:15 am
by mps_fan_club
I WONDER HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE SEEN AND HEARD BARRY(BAZ)COWELL OF MIKE PENDERS SEARCHERS. MIKE PICKED A VERY TALENTED BASS PLAYER WHO HAS BEEN WITH THE BAND FROM THE START. WITHOUT DOUBT HE HAS MANAGED TO RECREATE SOME OF THOSE FINE BASS LINES ON THE EARLY HITS THAT WERE SUCH A TRADE MARK OF TONY JACKSON. BUT - - ALSO CREATING A STYLE OF SLAP BASS OF HIS VERY OWN.
IN THE MID 80'SHE WAS BASS PLAYER WITH VIRGIN DANCE AND ALSO TOURED WITH THE EURYTHMICS
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2001 4:06 pm
by RJHC
_FRANK'S STYLE IS VERY GOOD BUT TONY JACKSON'S
SUBTILE SIMPLICITY IS SECOND ONLY TO SIR PAUL
McCARTNEY .
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2001 10:46 pm
by EC
Absolutely - Paul McCartney is one of the best musicians and most tasteful bass players ever!
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2001 2:28 pm
by royclough
Always intriqued why people want to be anonymous, unless it is Tony Jackson, of course.
Comparisions are essentially futile, the early Searchers albums had a rawness about them, probably because they were using guitars that they were using on their live gigs. By the time Frank came on board, the band had become more affluent and sponship deals no doubt had come their way, firstly Burns, later Aria.
Listen to the first album Frank played on "Sounds Like Searchers" and the sound is totally different to the sound that brought The Searchers to prominence.
I believe the Sire albums demonstrated that Frank was a very capable bass player, but the sound has always revolved round those "Jangly Riffs" for what of a better phrase.
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2001 7:45 pm
by admin
Roy: Good point about the change of guitars through sponsorship. Don't forget to mention the current ESP sponsorship which certainly gives them a different sound compared to their early days. I agree, it is the rhythm and lead guitars that have held centre stage for the most part. Tony Jackson did have a unique style and quite a booming bass though.