Page 1 of 2
Do I see checkerbinding?
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 11:26 am
by d_funkie
at the rickenbacker site, if you go to factory, and then the woodshop, on the 4th picture down, the second bass from the front looks like it has checker binding on one of its horns. how is this possible?
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 2:03 pm
by dminer
I'm not an expert,and I do need glasses for reading, but all I see is white binding, maybe it's your monitor.
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:03 pm
by dave4004
Dan, I see what you mean but I think it's just an artifact of digital photography.
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:12 pm
by mortivan
I don't know, that second bass sure looks like it has checkered binding. If you look real close on the opposite side (the smaller body horn), you can still see it.
I think it is checkered binding!
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:17 pm
by rick12dr
Dave W; I'd say you are correct! NO checked binding here![this opinion from one who used to have that job, among others, in the Rick woodshop...]
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:18 pm
by rob
It's just a joke. Don't worry about it.
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 4:23 pm
by banta
Want to see something really funny on the site? Look at the picture of the 4003S/5, which is now discontinued.
Tell me what you see.
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 7:21 pm
by basshawk
It sure does look like checkered binding on that second bass. I've looked at it through 2 different monitors and it's still there.
A joke indeed. (look what you can't have)
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 7:45 pm
by dminer
I still can't see it but if it is checkerboard, maybe it's a Lemmy model before the carving, although you would think the carving would happen before the binding was added.
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:28 am
by admin
Dan: You do indeed see checkered binding. This goes to show that, when it comes to Rickenbackers, we are driven by a level of analysis that is second to none. Here is a slighly magnified photo with contrast enhancement. Good eye!

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 9:01 am
by rick12dr
Somehow your computer manages to bring this pic into better focus with the resolution; on mine, the binding was indistinct.But there ya go!
While we are on the subject of binding, anyone read the copy during the factory tour regarding binding, where it says "Binding is a lost art, rarely attempted by others", or something to that effect.Excuse me??? Oh, and Gibson hasn't done a lot of it?? Guild?? Martin??I don't think the "art" is all that "lost".Rick does a nice job with their binding, but this copy makes them out to be a little more elite than they are.....
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 2:44 pm
by dave4004
It has maple wings, so it wouldn't be a Lemmy.
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 2:46 pm
by bottom4
Ouch! Dan!
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 9:16 pm
by rick12dr
Hey, I'm not putting Rick down, but I think the guys who do the binding work for these other great American companies might not dig being minimalized.I just think Rick could have done their copy work better,and still make rightful
compliments for their own workers.Doesn't matter What company does a binding job; to use this material for aesthetic enhancement takes skill, and I doubt a guy from Rick does it any better than a guy that's doing Gibson Jazz guitars.
My original point was that the copy made it sound as though Rick somehow corners the market with making instruments with binding on them.
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 6:34 am
by bottom4
Agreed! I'm just busting you!
Cheers!