Page 1 of 1

Bridge cover?

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:45 am
by frode
Hello.

Did these original had bridge covers? 1975 4001 and 1984 4003.

Image

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:49 am
by green_us90
Yes, all 4001 and 4003 basses have them as OEM.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 2:16 am
by frode
Ok, thanks Dave

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:13 am
by phlemmy
i want the pickguards and trc off of that jetglo!

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:22 am
by wints
Speaking of covers and surrounds this come up on E Bay yesterday. I haven't seen one of these before...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7351482480

It looks like a reissue horseshoe p/up which has lost it shoes, and then adapted to a normal cover.

Anyone else seen one?

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:32 am
by dswp
What the F### is that?????

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:00 am
by jnbass
hard to say if its a reissue, mine have all had machined top pole pieces.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:24 am
by rickcrazy
I believe Andrew is right, it is a re-issue HS with the 'shoes replaced with a high-gain cover.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 9:45 am
by jps
Well Andy certainly didn't take too long to hit the BIN! Let us know what you got there. Image

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:34 am
by wints
I was the 5th viewer and thought it was worth a look at that price. I'll report back when I receive it..

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 2:48 pm
by aceonbass
Hmm.. Well I've got a brand new bridge high gain in front of me and this looks just like it on the bottom. I'd say it's one of those with one of the later V63 surrounds. Definitely a good deal though since the surrounds are unavailable. I'd be interested in buying the surround if it's for sale when you get it Andrew.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:09 pm
by wints
Actually, that's the only part I need Dane! I'm still trying to put back together a 67.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:40 pm
by aceonbass
I would have actually bought it to reshape into the '67-'68 style as the shape is not correct for any actual vintage RIC but provides enough material to make it correct.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:17 pm
by jps
I think it is correct for a '63. We have gone down this road before, but Scott Jennings did verify that the black and white photo of the '63 4001 in the Smith book, that Scott had for a while, is indeed orginal and they look virtually the same.

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:21 pm
by jps
Image