Page 1 of 1
I think I'm becoming a C64 convert.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:18 am
by highway_star
I love the neck profile of the C64. It's much slimmer than my 4003 and feels more comfortable with my small hands. I can play my 4003 fine, but there's a much better ergonomic fit with the C64. I think the lack of binding also makes the body more comfortable to my right arm.
I have my current C64 strung with TI jazz flats, but I'm tempted to sell my 4003 and get another C64 set up with rounds.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:20 am
by rickaddict
There is no resisting the power of the S!
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:00 am
by teeder
I know how you feel! I love my V63's neck, and the C series have felt as good or better! There is something about the lack of binding. I tried a new 4003 in NYC last June, and there is no way I could play that neck!
I haven't felt a comfortable bound neck Rick yet.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:40 am
by highway_star
I discussed the issue with my wife and have the green light to get another C64 to replace my 4003. I'll probably get a Mapleglo one since my current C64 is Fireglo. Now I need to decide if I want to sell my 4003 as it is with the Hipshot bridge and Pickguardian bridge pickup surround or return it to stock and sell the other parts separately.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:48 am
by green_us90
Return to stock, sell parts separately IMO. You'll probably get more parted out that way.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:01 am
by jnbass
now to find a C64...
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:32 am
by highway_star
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:30 am
by rickfan63
How do those TI flats work with the C64?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:38 am
by highway_star
They work really well. They have a nice mellow sound and let a little of the "wood" sound come through. I also have TI Jazz Flats on my '62 RI J-Bass and the C64 sounds much more natural than the J-Bass. It's a very open, resonant sound. And of course, you can always go all-out "old school" and turn up the mutes.
I have Pyramid Flats on my v63, but I haven't done an A/B yet. I think the Pyramids may be a bit bassier but less open-sounding.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:42 am
by marc61
Nice pickup (no pun intended) on the c64.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:52 am
by highway_star
Thanks, but it is costing me my 4003. I had to promise the wife that much after singing the praises of my C64 while practicing last night. She's learned that going along just shuts me up sooner until I find the next new thing

.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:20 pm
by jnbass
list price $1699?
he scores!
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:25 am
by highway_star
And it's a good thing I got it when I did. I e-mailed Bass Emporium yesterday and the owner responded, even though the shop was closed. I sent the payment to him immediately afterwards to complete the deal.
I called the shop today to complete the details of the sale and found out that there were 4 or so other inquiries. There's no doubt it would have been sold by today at the latest.
Although my 4003 served me well, I can't pass up the improved ergonomics the C64 offers me. It will succeed the 4003 as my main passive stage bass.
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:53 am
by rickaddict
4 other inquiries? Must have been the lurkers.
Congrats, Ron. I expect pix upon shipment of said cool instrument!
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:28 am
by lowendbob
One of those inquiries was me. I actually saw the bass there last week, and forgot about it.
I thought their actual price would be lower than $1699, so congratulations Ron. Nice score!