Did anyone else see this?
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
WOW...Walnut wings, Grovers, no skunk strip.
Can it be real???
Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Did anyone else see this?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:36 pm
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:37 pm
I didnt see it originally, don't know how it got thru my searches, but it looks strange to me.
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:38 pm
The Grovers appear to be original and the wings look to be real.
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 2:01 pm
Yes, the Grovers are real and period-accurate, but the wings look as though they're merely painted on. Look closer. Doesn't the 'finish' on them appear to be missing in places?
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 2:29 pm
paint.
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 2:32 pm
I thought the "wings" might be a custom job. Looks the part.
What do you say John Simmons!
What do you say John Simmons!
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 2:42 pm
The dings on the corners give it away.
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 2:47 pm
ya it is a 4003 with stained headwings ...
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 7:18 pm
It's got a silk screened TRC on it too. It does look like paint though, did anyone think to ask him?
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 1:13 am
Is a two-piece neck normal for a very early 4003? I've never seen anything other than a one-piece.
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 2:30 am
Yes, a two-piece neck is normal for early 4003 basses. The bass has a silk screened TRC instead of a raised-letter one because it's a lefty.
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 6:25 am
I blew up the picture of the back-side of the headstock and it is clear that the wings are fake. The grain of the maple extends from the light wood right into the dark areas. Also, there is an area below the E tuner where the masking was a bit off and the "walnut" is slightly angled. The chips at the corners are suggestive but not conclusive.