Page 1 of 1
Haven't we seen this one before?
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:21 pm
by bassduke49
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:29 pm
by jwr2
something wrong with the headstock ...
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:56 am
by markbass99
Oreo! That jetglo finish needs a scratch x/zymol treatment bad.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:52 am
by cheyenne
Yeah, the headstock.
Tuners are wrong and I dont think thats all.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:35 am
by sashua
C'mon gents. Look carefully....It is the Emperor casting that Shadow!
Stay well away from this one.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:45 am
by ben_brown
He's bidding not seeling it.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:11 am
by frode
Whats wrong?? That bass look legit except for new tuners. The jetglo is typical greenish and that black/white binding, think it´s called thin line(?), I have seen on several basses from that period. Not bad if you ask me:-)
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:23 am
by 40014002
I would love to see a picture from the rear of the head stock as some thing is not right here.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:26 am
by kcole4001
The tuners are definitely wrong. They don't project out far enough from the side of the headstock, & they're too big. They look like the ones commonly found on fakers, though the bass looks real enough.
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:33 pm
by ilan
It's back
(Oh, post #1,500...)
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:33 am
by linganstan
the pickguard looks like it's made of the same material as my 4002....with the black and white laminate.......
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:47 am
by ilan
Looks to me like light reflecting from the pickguard edges, Dale. It's a single-ply 1/8" thick Ric pickguard.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:53 am
by linganstan
now that ya mention it........yer right........plus, the laminated version on mine is beveled with two white layers........