Page 1 of 1
Various Bass tunings....
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:58 am
by webhead
Quick question if anyone knows. How would you tune a Fender Bass VI? Do you tune it to EADGBE?
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:16 am
by sloop_john_b
Yep.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:28 am
by jingle_jangle
It's a baritone guitar, tuned a full octave lower than a standard 6er, but not like a contemporary 6-string bass, which is tuned CGDAEB...
The idea that Leo had was to provide a sort of bass with an extended upper range. The smallest gauge string on the Bass VI is a wound .025" E.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:37 am
by sloop_john_b
I love these instruments. I got to play a '66 at Rudy's, they wanted somehting wacky like $8k for it. I'm always on the lookout for the Japanese ones - i'm trying hard not to cave and get one of the Fender CS ones.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:28 am
by webhead
An octave lower 'eh?
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:49 am
by sloop_john_b
You got it, Gerald. Do you have one of these?
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:02 pm
by jingle_jangle
John, there's a Japanese one on the 'bay right now, $1600 with a couple of days left.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:14 pm
by webhead
Yes I just got the CS one. I tried going an octave lower on the low E for starters. The string flaps all over the place. Am I doing this correctly? Or am I just an idiot?
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:08 pm
by sloop_john_b
The one I played had a really tight low E string. The low E on the VI should be exactly the same as a low E on a bass.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:33 am
by jwr2
Quote: "but not like a contemporary 6-string bass, which is tuned CGDAEB"
I think most 6 string basses are tuned BEADGC ... at least that is how I would tune one if I played one ... and the 7 string basses that I have seen were tuned F#BEADGC ... most 5 string basses are BEADG ... but some are EADGC ... and some 4 strings are tuned BEAD or ADGC ... and then of course there are many more alternate tunings ...
and the only old Fender VI that I played was tuned EADGEB with fat flatwound strings ... I think it was about 28" in scale if I remember correctly ...
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:58 am
by markbass99
I think Paul was quoting from smallest string to largest string instead of the usual method of largest string to smallest, that's the way I interpreted it. If you're tuning in fourths that is.....
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:49 am
by jwr2
oh ya ... I missed that ... duh!!!