360 CW FG 6 string

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
360dave660
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 5:00 pm

360 CW FG 6 string

Post by 360dave660 »

I just wanted to shout out that about a week ago I got my Carl Wilson LE 360 6-string from RicsRus in the UK. What a beaut ! Now I have a 360-6 MG with highgains, a 360-12 JG with toasters and this CW in FG. I shall be fun discovering the subtle differences between them.
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Congrats, David! I have a 360/6 CW JG that I bought new from Mike Parks when they first came out, and I love it. My experience is that each guitar has its own unique 'voice' and no two are exactly alike.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
wmthor
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 3475
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:14 am

Post by wmthor »

David, congratulations on your new acquisition. I firmly believe that the CW's are probably the best Rics made.

I only wish that I would have bought a left-handed 360/6 CW when I had the chance. However, I came across it a couple of months after I bought my left-handed 360/12 CW and did not have any extra funds laying around.

http://home.att.net/~wmthor/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-553895.html
'96 1997 LH MG
'98 360 LH MG
'00 360/12 Carl Wilson LH FG
'07 730S Shiloh LH
360dave660
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 5:00 pm

Post by 360dave660 »

I'll have to take some pictures and post them of my "tricouleurs". I had traded a 660-6 FG with Chris at pick of the ricks early this year for my 360/12 JG because he felt it was one of the best necks he had seen for a 12. My 660 was a very beautiful piece built at the time of the CW (spring summer 2000). The flame and lutherie on the 360 CW is quite similar to the 660. I like a lot that I have a nice sampling of this 360 model. Also, by having the CW I don't have to modify the MG with toasters to keep the highgains. I am not necessarily one to believe that the toasters are "better" or the "real sound " of rics because, the higains have existed in production since 1970 and I don't think from a business perspective that Rickenbacker would have "killed the goose that layed the golden egg" if the change in the p/u was going to alter tremendously the sound, or take away its signature.

Outside my gretsch 6122, I have exclusively the 360s. The rics always seem more versatile than expected. My tweeking your amp, you can do a ton with it that goes beyond the sixties sound. Moreover, the fact that it is perceived to be almost a niche instrument, allows the ric enthousiast to develop an innovative sound in other genres : blues, rock, jazz, country, etc.

Put simply, I just love this product and cherish them. They make me happy everytime practically that I pick them up, even though I have come to the guitar later than most and have no pretentions of being any good at it.

I know that there will be another at some point. I share the hopes of others that there will be an azurglo 620 on the horizon. I prefer the thin neck and have no real beef with the higains, so I think that it would be a stock acquisition. Besides, the value of that guitar as a deluxe solidbody can not be underestimated.

best regards to you all.

PS : I've got tickets to see Brian Wilson in March at the Olympia in Paris.
360dave660
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 5:00 pm

Post by 360dave660 »

I'll have to take some pictures and post them of my "tricouleurs". I had traded a 660-6 FG with Chris at pick of the ricks early this year for my 360/12 JG because he felt it was one of the best necks he had seen for a 12. My 660 was a very beautiful piece built at the time of the CW (spring summer 2000). The flame and lutherie on the 360 CW is quite similar to the 660. I like a lot that I have a nice sampling of this 360 model. Also, by having the CW I don't have to modify the MG with toasters to keep the highgains. I am not necessarily one to believe that the toasters are "better" or the "real sound " of rics because, the higains have existed in production since 1970 and I don't think from a business perspective that Rickenbacker would have "killed the goose that layed the golden egg" if the change in the p/u was going to alter tremendously the sound, or take away its signature.

Outside my gretsch 6122, I have exclusively the 360s. The rics always seem more versatile than expected. My tweeking your amp, you can do a ton with it that goes beyond the sixties sound. Moreover, the fact that it is perceived to be almost a niche instrument, allows the ric enthousiast to develop an innovative sound in other genres : blues, rock, jazz, country, etc.

Put simply, I just love this product and cherish them. They make me happy everytime practically that I pick them up, even though I have come to the guitar later than most and have no pretentions of being any good at it.

I know that there will be another at some point. I share the hopes of others that there will be an azurglo 620 on the horizon. I prefer the thin neck and have no real beef with the higains, so I think that it would be a stock acquisition. Besides, the value of that guitar as a deluxe solidbody can not be underestimated.

best regards to you all.

PS : I've got tickets to see Brian Wilson in March at the Olympia in Paris.
360dave660
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 5:00 pm

Post by 360dave660 »

sorry for the double post !
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”