Page 1 of 2
Erk!!! Need I say any more?
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:36 am
by ozover50
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:12 am
by elysrand
Of all the ones I have seen, this one does not possess enough similarity that I would be fooled. Even the shape is distorted and non-proportional to the 400x series. It does not seem to be an actionable faker..
The guy was dumb to use auction text to say that it was a "modern Rickenbacker", though

Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:19 am
by sowhat
Modern days, modern days... "this looks like a Rick albeit it doesn't"...
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:25 am
by frode
In Norway we say: "Æsj" to somethink like that.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:27 am
by rickfan60
We have seen one of those before. But is it far enough off the mark to avoid being torpedoed?
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:00 am
by jingle_jangle
Torpedo it for its color. Last time I saw that was in a (used) diaper.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:19 am
by sowhat
D'oh. And the baby wasn't very healthy at the moment...
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:24 am
by jingle_jangle
Mashed succotash, Sheena.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:26 am
by rickfan60
The RIC staff back in the 70's had a similar name for AG.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:29 am
by sowhat
Hmmm... perhaps some carrot as well?
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:53 pm
by jps
"Description of shape is similar to an old Rickenbacker but modernised!"
Ricks don't need no stinkin' (see discussion about color above) modernizing!
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:43 pm
by pflash4001
EEEEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:46 pm
by s4001
ugh.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:04 pm
by pflash4001
I think that is the new caca-glo finish...
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:21 am
by rickcrazy
A.k.a. "p**p-glo".
