Page 1 of 5

YOU THINK THE A380 IS BIG?

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:41 am
by jingle_jangle
Have a gander at this beast, proposed by designer Norman Bel Geddes in 1929, as "the airliner of 1940":

Image

Image

Image

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:49 am
by 86kubicki
It looks like a cross between a plane and a cruise ship. I love the fact that it has a bar and a dining room!

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:52 am
by squid
Wow, does that bring back some memories. As a young boy, and even for a time while I was a teenager, I fancied becoming an aerospace engineer. I used to pour over books on the history of aerospace, and I remember seeing that design in a little paperback issued by Penguin. I never really liked it, but it's a bold idea that clearly never died (there's talk of putting casinos and shopping concourses in some A380's). It always reminded me of one of those old Flash Gordon films.

On the off-chance that anyone cares -- I doubt anyone does -- I think Boeing's probably got it right with the 787. Both planes are wonderful pieces of engineering, but IMHO the 787 is a more elegant approach.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:11 am
by simer4001
Did this thing ever fly?

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:25 am
by johnhall
I can imagine that the ride in those staterooms out in the wings could be quite interesting during even light chop or moderate turbulence.

On the other hand, if the staterooms were generally in use for "mile high club" activities, maybe nobody would notice.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:55 am
by bitzerguy
Image
And I bet that "lookoff" would be real interesting. A bit windy perhaps?

...Dean

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:58 am
by bassduke49
No, that never flew, but luxury similar to that was a feature of some of the huge transoceanic Zeppelins, such as the Hindenburg. Back in those days, travel was assumed to be slow, so comfort was an important issue. Later, as heavier-than-air craft were refined, speed became the dominant criteria, comfort, less so.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:01 am
by bassduke49
Dean, I think that reads "lookout." They would have a crew member in each wingtip to help the pilot avoid bumping into, oh, maybe a continent or something.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:02 am
by winston
Now that's a concept aeroplane if I ever saw one. I like it. Unfortunately it would never have been very practical. It probably would have been challenging to fly. Look at all those power plants that would need to be synchronized.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:16 am
by octagon
I used to collect radios and I always wanted this "Patriot" which was designed by Norman Bel Geddes:

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/11/na/hod_2001.722.11.htm

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:20 am
by janglerocker
Maybe the term "lookout" was meant as a scenic viewing area for passengers vs. a crew lookout? Wouldn't catch me out there, though!

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:42 am
by jingle_jangle
How 'bout this one?

Kind of in the same vein...it's a Raymond Loewy pencil sharpener from 1939:

Image

It's got the lowest Cd of any sharpener ever made...

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:25 am
by kenposurf
Cool sharpener! Would that be considered deco or streamline?

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:34 am
by winston
I think that the sharpener is a great looking design, but look at the table that Paul built.

Now that, is way too cool.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:48 am
by jingle_jangle
Thanks, Brian. It's actually the counter in my office. It's AFG. The table is FG and is at my home.

George, it's definitely from the Streamline design vocabulary.