Page 1 of 2

Which flats for a C64 - Beatles sound?

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:17 am
by mojo_jojo
Which flatwound strings would you suggest for a 4001C64 for that Beatles-era sound? Gauge? Thanks

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:33 am
by rickfan60
TI (Thomastik Infeld) jazz flats are quite good in that application. Chromes are also pretty popular around here.

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:17 am
by zoomduck
Pyramid Gold

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:59 am
by iamthebassman
I play bass in a Beatles trib band and string my 4001SLH with Chromes. TIs don't give me enuff treble bite for songs like "...Help From My Friends", and Pyramids are even worse(duller). Believe me, I've tried them all. YMMV.
Image

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:49 am
by tennis_nick
And if it makes you feel better, Chromes are easier to get too! probably cheaper too!

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:17 am
by zoomduck
Hmmmm...Chromes.....Floppy they are .

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:31 am
by sloop_john_b
Never in my experience, Barry. TI's yes, but not Chromes.

Pyramids practically ruined my c64. Real bad tailpiece lift and they basically bowed the neck too. Put some Chromes on and she was fine.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:51 am
by woodyng
john-what was the gauge size on the chromes? just curious,pyramid flats only come in one gauge,and when i switched to the same gauge in chromes,they seemed to have a similar tension...i recently took pyramids off my 4000,although i was not experiencing any difficulty with them.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:04 am
by woodyng
oh yeah,meant to say that when the pyramids were still on my bass,it sounded x-actly like the sound on macca's "silly love songs"- i never tried roto tru-bass nylon strings,probably would sound good,but they are a really large gauged string set.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:19 am
by fireglo
I've just switched to TIs from Pyramids, and I like the TIs better. They don't seem floppy to me, and I think they sound better. Plus, I like the fact that I'm not putting so much tension on my bass any more. I had tailpiece lift with the Pyramids, but when I switched to TIs my tailpiece has almost no lift now.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:53 am
by mojo_jojo
So, if I put a set of TI JF344's on my C64 I should not have any problem with tail-lift? Is the gauge on these strings lighter than the factory-installed rounds on the C64?

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:11 am
by woodyng
yes,richard,the ti's are definitely a much lighter gauge,very low tension string. i can't imagine any tension-related problems coming from using them-and a lot of folks do like them.to me,they are just too small/loose feeling...and according to john hall,ti's are the closest thing to the flatwounds rickenbacker installed on their basses in years past...

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:49 am
by lyle_from_minneapolis
I use the D'addario Chromes Extra Light on my '72 4001. The are not too costly, not floppy, not a taillifting proposition, and they can really nail the sound you're after.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:51 am
by lyle_from_minneapolis
And if you really want to nail "Lucy in the Sky" try just a touch of mute.

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:05 am
by zoomduck
Im just a glutton for punishment.....I really like Pyramids , Fender Flats , and especially LaBella Jamersons . I like high tension strings for some reason......I did grow up playing 60s Fender basses Image