Page 1 of 2

385 & 385S

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:27 pm
by jsm610
Has anyone ever seen a 385 or 385S - were these made outside of the photos of the ones in JH's collection?

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:29 pm
by 8mileshigh
Nope...........and if you've found one............can I be your best friend! Image

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:41 pm
by glen_l
I've seen a vintage 385.

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:54 pm
by 8mileshigh
Where Glen?

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:01 pm
by Scastles
I think there is only one of the Spanish style, isn't there? It wasn't marketed, was it?

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:48 pm
by kennyhowes
Any pre-nineties Ric acoustic would be rare as heck. There's plenty of pics of examples besides the ones here @ the museum, where's they all end up???

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:34 pm
by jps
They are all in my attic!

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:35 pm
by jps
I wish!

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:32 pm
by jingle_jangle
Jeff, stop mumbling and say what's on your mind... :wink:

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:29 am
by doctorwho
Does the Nelson family still have Rick Nelson's original acoustic?

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:40 am
by jwilli
I thought that Chris Squire had one. I forgot the story behind it though. :wink:

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:44 am
by dswp
jwilli wrote:I thought that Chris Squire had one. I forgot the story behind it though. :wink:
When I spoke to Chris a while back, we did talk about a rare Ric acoustic that he owned. I believe that it is this one as well.

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:06 pm
by glen_l
This is the real thing. It was verified by JH some years back

Re: 385 & 385S

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:02 pm
by kennyhowes
glen_l wrote:This is the real thing. It was verified by JH some years back
Holy cow. That thing is unreal.

Re:

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:19 pm
by collin
Scastles wrote:I think there is only one of the Spanish style, isn't there? It wasn't marketed, was it?
Apparently not, Stan!

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=414693&p=855567#p855565


(apologies for the Kenny Howes-esque 10-year-old thread bump. :) )