Page 1 of 6
'66 360/12 complete resto
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:01 am
by jdogric12
Hey gang. I'd like to solicit suggestions for my next project. The title says it all. I'm torn between burgundyglo and amber fireglo. I'm also considering "relic-ing" it like Fender does with their stuff. Opinions please! Thanks, J
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:06 am
by sloop_john_b
Burgundyglo, light amber coat over it. Then again, a period correct color might be better. There's not gonna be any patches in the body that need covering, right?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:13 am
by dale_fortune
Sounds like a good project if you have the right guitar to start with. You'll probably get a few people worked up over the period aging of it. IMO: if it's yours, do what you want and enjoy it. I've always appreciated the look of a played/worn guitar, they show their history. These are guitars, you play them, they wear, put them in a museum and they'll look new forever.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:40 am
by jdogric12
Thanks guys.
Dale - I agree. If people want to hang them in a museum, that is all well and good, but it's cool to play 'em too. And I think a 60's Rick that is recently restored but looks like it's worn would be cool. I could play it without fear, and get reespeect from the other dogs.
JB - Good point on the period correctness. Didnt' they have BG in 66? Parks' timeline says so. No patches to cover. And I have the serial plate, so how cool is that?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:41 am
by longhouse
I'm guessing it's already 'relic'd'.
Intentionally making a guitar look old and worn is anathema to me. But a total restoration of your '66 360 sounds great.
Burgundyglo is nice. But if you've got some nice figure in the wood, go with Fireglo / Amber-Fireglo.
Best of luck.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:45 am
by sloop_john_b
Hmm, I can't remember having seen it that early, I thought it was '68 for them.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:14 am
by leftybass
BG wasn't around in '66...My 'purist' vote would be for Fireglo.

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:54 am
by beatlefreak
AFG would be cool. I wouldn't relic it, but that's just me. With your stage antics, it'll probably end up that way soon enough!

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:54 am
by jingle_jangle
AFG, and instead of restoring it and then relicking it, just leave it alone. It's probably pre-relicked.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:48 am
by 8mileshigh
That's what I was just thinking? Any photos J Dog? Maybe just play the heck out of it as it is?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:49 am
by jdogric12
Well, the body is covered in an opaque burgundy color, even the cavity, so it has to be stripped anyway. The neck and headstock have no finish at all. I'm really hoping for some CB under there!
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:00 am
by jdogric12
Thanks everybody! I'll post pics tonight. Thanks to the guy who sold it to me too, he can identify himself if he wishes. It's no state secret though.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:32 am
by dale_fortune
J Dog, if it's the toilet seat model 360 then it will have CB on the back only.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:39 am
by jdogric12
Yep, it's got the rounded edges on the top.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:03 am
by dswp
Even knowing the guitar the little that I do, a full restoration is needed.
JDog, I say that you have a real gem there. Do it up with a new factory correct finish. Given the work that must be done, I vote Jetglo.