What qualifies one to be a good Rickenbacker collector?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:54 am
(Split from http://www.rickresource.com/phpBB3/post ... 2&p=393541)
My passion to Rickenbacker does include some "I really must have it", is that a bad thing? I AM a musician and I currently play on a small group, nothing too serious though and I can get back to the point of not playing with a band really quick...
I wonder what qualifies one to be "ok" when he purchases an expensive Rick. At least 1 album out? working part time as a musician and part time as a bar tender?
Don't take my question personally - I really understand your annoyance with people who never play and buy these guitars because they can afford them and they look nice (and by that - take the price up for everyone else). I just wonder where does the line cross, I am sure that if my good pal Marc (marc67 here in the forum) would buy one this will qualify as a justified purchase, he makes ends meet making music for the past 15 years. He is a good example for a "legitimate" Vintage Rick owner.
I also agree that when someone who can't/won't play purchase a vintage Rick this might qualify as an "illegitimate" purchase.
Again: where do you think the line crosses?
This is an open question to everyone as it really interests me.
(Again, Gareth: You simply "sparked" the life back to a question I had in mind for months... This is not an attack on you or on anybody else (sometimes I seem a bit aggressive)).
Cheers.
The one (and only) time I saw a 4005 was in one of the stores on Denmark street in London, I never played it and I only heard it on records.gareth wrote:As I said to Paul W, I really regret selling mine back in the 80's, but I was a Wal endorsee, and they were losing patience with me sneaking my Ricks onto recordings. Also, I was brokeI'll never be able to afford one again for sure. I have a sneaking suspicion that the prices of these are being driven up by people who just HAVE to have one, depsite the fact that they have never seen one or played one, and once they get them, are unlikely to use them for their intended purpose. I don't have a real problem with speculators to be honest, as I own four Rick basses that are only getting more expensive by the moment. I just wish I had my old 4005 back to play. I loved that bass. I hope whover has her now plays her. I'd hate to think of her stuck in a case in a vault somewhere.
My passion to Rickenbacker does include some "I really must have it", is that a bad thing? I AM a musician and I currently play on a small group, nothing too serious though and I can get back to the point of not playing with a band really quick...
I wonder what qualifies one to be "ok" when he purchases an expensive Rick. At least 1 album out? working part time as a musician and part time as a bar tender?
Don't take my question personally - I really understand your annoyance with people who never play and buy these guitars because they can afford them and they look nice (and by that - take the price up for everyone else). I just wonder where does the line cross, I am sure that if my good pal Marc (marc67 here in the forum) would buy one this will qualify as a justified purchase, he makes ends meet making music for the past 15 years. He is a good example for a "legitimate" Vintage Rick owner.
I also agree that when someone who can't/won't play purchase a vintage Rick this might qualify as an "illegitimate" purchase.
Again: where do you think the line crosses?
This is an open question to everyone as it really interests me.
(Again, Gareth: You simply "sparked" the life back to a question I had in mind for months... This is not an attack on you or on anybody else (sometimes I seem a bit aggressive)).
Cheers.