Page 1 of 1
Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:37 pm
by jcreasy
the 350 v63 looks odd? Specifically the headstock, trussrod cover. Ever notice how far it extends, and how much white field there is with respect to the logo?
Standing by ready to get flamed with your replies...
JKC
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:49 pm
by melibreits
The 325's and 350's have my favorite Rickenbacker shape.... So sleek and lovely, from headstock to tailpiece! I'm very pleased to have such a pretty guitar:
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:41 pm
by scotty
Melissa i love you photos there so Flowery and soft im not slagging you off by the way, Just an observation

I might add they always look gr8
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:53 pm
by sloop_john_b
jcreasy wrote:the 350 v63 looks odd? Specifically the headstock, trussrod cover. Ever notice how far it extends, and how much white field there is with respect to the logo?
Standing by ready to get flamed with your replies...
JKC
Pretty sure the 350 uses the same TRC as every other model that uses a plexi one.
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:00 pm
by ozover50
Nothing odd about them as far as I'm concerned...........
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:50 pm
by gregga41
I love them, not odd at all!
My son also has his eye on my 350!


- This boy has TASTE!
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:16 pm
by eggman
Howdy,
Is the 350 a 320 with a 330 neck? To my eyes, the neck looks too long for the body. Still, it's Rickenbacker and therefore-gorgeous!
Eggman
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:26 pm
by sharkboy
I've given it another serious look after the original comments here. No flames, but I don't see anything goofy about the accoutrements. It looks spectacular in blueburst. I don't tknow whether I'd want a burst or a mapleglow or a blueboy most.
I almost bought a Chandler 555 some years ago because I loved the body shape. I think the only thing that discouraged me was that it said "I bet you wish I was a real Rickenbacker" when I tried it. I did like the headstock of that one too.
The 350 still hovering toward the top of my list for standard Rickenbacker electrics I don't already have. I think I'd put Paul's Rickenbacker acoustics a little higher on my really-really-want-but-can't-do-anything-about-right-now list.
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:39 pm
by godber
Nice peonies Melissa!
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:47 pm
by ric330
Nice set of triplets Howard.
Great photos.
I like both the 325 and the 350's and but I prefer the 350 because of the scale length.
To my eyes they're both beautiful.
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:01 pm
by winston
jcreasy wrote:the 350 v63 looks odd? Specifically the headstock, trussrod cover. Ever notice how far it extends, and how much white field there is with respect to the logo?
Standing by ready to get flamed with your replies...
JKC
I actually prefer the v63 TRC and headstock to the Liverpool model (which I have). It's how
All Rickenbacker guitar TRC's and headstocks should look.
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:13 am
by beatlefreak
I think they look just fine.
Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:44 am
by scotty
Nice peonies Melissa!
HaHa

Re: Who here thinks...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:51 am
by jcreasy
Let me compare the v63 to the Liverpoole. It just seemed to me that the point goes out past the G tuner and there is an awful lot of white in the field. I love the shape of the 350s... Just my 2 cents.
By the bye, I bought a Chandler 555 with three Seymore Duncan Humbuckers... Love it.
JKC