Page 1 of 2
using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:09 am
by ramonesfreak
hi. i have a 330-12 that ive restrung as a 6. so far it plays just like a 6 should. i have not adjusted the trus rods to compensate because so far it seems ok..however, its only been a few days. im wondering if anyone has done this longterm and experienced any negative effects on the neck ? thanks.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:58 pm
by beatlefreak
If it will handles 12 strings, it will handle 6.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:31 pm
by ramonesfreak
i was worried about it warping the opposite way...becoming convex...if some adjustment is not made to the truss rods.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:07 pm
by jdogric12
Welcome Scott!
What you've done is typically discouraged, and may affect any warranty you have. If it works fine now, that's cool, but you may have some problems re-acclimating it to 12 strings. There are many here with better info and knowledge than me; hopefully they will chime in. All the best, J
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:29 pm
by ramonesfreak
thanks. thats the type of info im curious about...not about the warranty...but about the effect the longterm use of 6 strings may have on it. if anyone has tried this, i would appreciate any info or warnings etc....
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:16 am
by jdogric12
Try cross posting this under the "technical" topic. The gurus always check those, including Dale, who used to work at RIC.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:30 pm
by ramonesfreak
is there a "technical" section or more appropriate section for this question? i cant find one and im hoping to get some input
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:29 pm
by scott_s
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the only differences between a 6- and 12-string Ric are the headstock, nut, bridge, and tailpiece. I can't fathom how restringing with only 6 strings could hurt it, although it's always a good idea to readjust the truss rods if they need it.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:50 pm
by firstbassman
This is probably one of the most common topics that is brought up on this, and other, forum(s).
And for the life of me I cannot imagine why anyone would do this.
Converting a 12-string Rickenbacker to a six-string, to me, makes about as much sense as removing two tires off my car to see how it will run as a motorcycle.
If anyone out there hates their 12-string RIC that much, you may send them to me.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:10 pm
by ramonesfreak
Well, Mark - I will refrain from insulting you and try to explain briefly. First of all, I never said I was "converting" anything. Playing your 12 string as a 6 string ONLY involves removing the extra 6 octave strings. thats it. I did it 3 weeks ago and have been playing it daily as a 6 string.
I never said I "hated" my Rickenbacker 12 string. In fact I love it. I simply wanted to play it as a 6 string because I do not have the resources to purschase another Rickenbacker right now. What I was worried about, was whether this decrease in tension on the neck would cause any permanent damage
I dont really see how this could possible compair to removing two wheels off your car in order to experience it as a motorcycle
And, furthermore, in the event that playing my 12string with 6 less strings is "ok" for the guitar, then-- I guess I just saved my self $1,500 because now I dont have to buy another 330. I can simply use it as a 6 until I am satisfied and then put the other 6 strings back on when the I have the urge to play it with 12 strings. Seems pretty cool to me that the 12 string is so versatile ....
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:35 pm
by firstbassman
Scott, my sincerest apologies if it seemed in any way that I was being insulting to you or your post. I tried to intentionally make my post as generic as possible (ie; “this subject comes often” etc.) and not was not specifically directly addressed to you. (Though, obviously, you started the thread.)
The point I was trying to make (in my sometimes bungled manner) was that a 12-string guitar (of any make) is a thing of musical and visual beauty and should, by some rights, have a different name because it is so different from a six-string guitar. (Just as a mandolin has its own name instead of being called “that little itsy bitsy guitar with eight strings.”) To me, it is the most special sounding instrument in the world (especially RIC-12s) and that it should maintain its own characteristics and identity.
Removing half of the 12 strings, in my mind, is “converting” it. Could be a semantic issue there I guess.
But anyway, it’s your instrument. You can do whatever you want with it. But I am also entitled to my opinion that a six-string guitar, a 12-string guitar, a bass are all unique instruments all with their own beauty and purpose and I’m thankful that I have (at least) two of each to enjoy.
I hope that my previous post does not discourage you at all from remaining a member of the forum.
Best to all, - Mark
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:52 pm
by ramonesfreak
no problem. im not offended. i agree with you, except i dont think leaving 6 strings off is converting it. im not interested in changing the nut or the bridge or anything else. its just that ive been wanting a 2nd rick forever and because ive got so much other great gear and no extra money, im not in the position to buy another one. one day while restringing the 12, i noticed in the process that the only obvious difference is that the nut accomodates 12 strings and not just 6. so, i decided i would satisfy my urge and also, my need for a Rick 6 string for a while, by leaving the extra strings off.
believe me, if i had another Rick, i would leave my 12 as it is. however, i must admit that even though the 12 is amazing and is one of my favorite colors...montezuma brown....it sits on the stand more than my other guitars simply because its a 12...and at this point in time, all i want to play is a Rick - full time. at some point, i will get another Rick, but in the meantime i was curious if anyone had done this and experienced any problems regarding string tension and the neck. i will say for anyone else interested...that in 3 weeks or more, the guitar plays and sounds like any other Rick 330-6 with toasters that ive played before...and that is something that i think is awsome. in a way, the Rick 12 is two of the coolest guitars in 1 which makes me love it even more.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:22 pm
by captsandwich
Wouldn't you get all sorts of rattles & buzzing from the unused tuners? A band that opened for mine a few years ago had a guitarist that played an old 450/12 as a six, but the extra tuners had been removed. I'm pretty sure Fred Smith of the MC5 played his 12 as a six string.

Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:34 pm
by ramonesfreak
i have not experienced any buzzing or rattling from the unused tuners or other components whatsoever.. so far, the guitar plays and sounds exactly like a 330-6, even when not plugged in. i have also experimented by just using some octave strings such as doubleing up the high E string or D string just to give the guitar an interesting sound and, so i can bend the G and B stings as normal, but still get some chimey drony sounds.
Re: using 330-12 as a 6 string?
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:48 pm
by captsandwich
Cool.
Just as an aside, I found that since I acquired my 12 sting, it gets more playing time than any of my other guitars. I really only play my 6 when I'm playing stuff with lots of bendy soloing.