Page 1 of 1
450v63
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:53 pm
by brianeharmonjr
I recently sold an original '63 425 on ebay for a friend, and after setting it up and putting new strings on it, I kinda fell in love with it. I just recently realized that Ric did a reissue of the 425 and 450 guitars. Does anybody have any experience with both the vintage and reissue? I'm thinking about getting a 450v63 if it is anything near the original 425. So, if anyone has some insight, or if anyone has one for sale, please let me know.
Re: 450v63
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:34 pm
by rick_ovic
Brian, I have a '59 425 and a '67 450-12.
The '59 425 has a superb playing neck and the thicker, non-rounded edge body shape. It's a great player, but the positioning of the single toaster pickup (half way between "bridge" and "middle" positions) provides a little less twang than I'd like. I paid $1000 for it around three years ago.
The '67 450-12 has the two toasters and the rounded edge body shape. It's very comfortable to play, super low action and the width of the neck is fairly narrow.
This one I purchased for $1250 about two years ago.
I think that the 450 especially is a very underrated guitar and I've always jumped to it's defence. You can still purchase these for less than $2000 if you search a little. My preference would be to buy vintage rather than reissue - why not have the real thing?
Re: 450v63
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:23 pm
by 1965
Wow, those seem like really decent prices for vintage instruments. I like the quirkyness of the 425 model's huge pickguard and such. As a one pickup model it's quite attractive.
Re: 450v63
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:28 pm
by rick_ovic
Wes, you're right...I think I both of these purchases were good value. However, you should still be able to pick up either model of the same vintage for around $1500, maybe a little more for a 450. It's a matter of keeping your eye on the ball and doing the necessary ground work.

Re: 450v63
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:44 am
by doctorwho
I just put some fresh strings on my 450v63 JG:

- 1999 450v63 JG
It does play sweet ... but I think that the neck feels a little 'thicker' than the one on the 1967 450 MG that I gave to my grand-niece:

- 1967 450 MG
but it's been a while since I played that one.
Re: 450v63
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:25 am
by rick_ovic
Re: 450v63
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:31 am
by 1965
looks nice, I don't know about $2500 nice though. The 425/450 are the only guitars I like with the cresting wave body shape
Re: 450v63
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:22 am
by doctorwho
1965 wrote:looks nice, I don't know about $2500 nice though. The 425/450 are the only guitars I like with the cresting wave body shape
Hmmm ... then you don't like the 460 because of the binding?

- 1981 460 BG
Re: 450v63
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:05 pm
by 1965
It's ok, but I like the utter simplicity of the 425 best. Even if the pickup isn't in the pristine location
Re: 450v63
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:48 pm
by brianeharmonjr
Gary, is that your 460 BG? That is a stunner. My 425v63 BG should be arriving Thursday.
Re: 450v63
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:48 am
by doctorwho
Yep, Brian, that is my baby. Plays great, feels great, and it's the dark 'plumglo' version of BG. Found it through serendipity on gbase mis-listed as a 620 Fireglo (!) and snagged it immediately. It's been my primary 6-string ever since!
I'll be interested in hearing your impressions of the 425v63 after you've had a chance to play it.