Page 1 of 5
Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:50 am
by espidog
Another of those Sandberg pseudo-Ricks, and a lefty too:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/SANDBERG-CUSTOM-4 ... 0238324865
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:12 pm
by weemac
If they went to the bother of macking a quality instrument, why did they not come up with a totaly original design rather than a poorly realised copy?
It' looks yucky!
emac.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:14 pm
by deargdoom
I see nothing wrong with it, it's an almost copy, live with it.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:32 pm
by 1965
deargdoom wrote:I see nothing wrong with it, it's an almost copy, live with it.
You're not going to last long here. The cheap Japanese rip-offs of years ago are one thing because they already exist, this is different.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:38 pm
by berth
deargdoom wrote:I see nothing wrong with it, it's an almost copy, live with it.
An almost copy? If anything won't sound like a Rick than this would be it!
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:31 pm
by kiramdear
oh, that's gross... but I won't need firewood till November.

Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:33 pm
by rickenbrother
deargdoom wrote:I see nothing wrong with it, it's an almost copy, live with it.
It's an infringement on a RIC design...and one of those won't be living with me!!
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:30 pm
by chefothefuture
Whaddya think them four lil dots are for.....
Enough dots?
Dot's enough!
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:04 am
by whojamfan
Putting looks, copyright infringement, and those lovely dots aside, why would anyone pay the same money for a copy than for the real thing?
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:45 am
by 1965
whojamfan wrote:Putting looks, copyright infringement, and those lovely dots aside, why would anyone pay the same money for a copy than for the real thing?
Because it's CUSTOM!!

Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 am
by deargdoom
1965 wrote:deargdoom wrote:I see nothing wrong with it, it's an almost copy, live with it.
You're not going to last long here. The cheap Japanese rip-offs of years ago are one thing because they already exist, this is different.
I fail to see the logic of that argument. A copy is a copy either way.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:28 am
by jwr2
If I ever see a 5 string Sandberg Ric copy I would buy it in an instant ... It would be superior to any 5 string bass that came out of the Ric factory.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:38 am
by Darkhollow
Looks to be of higher quality than most companies make when they steal a design from Ric. But, if you were going to make a copy of that model, I think the neck through is one of the most important design features you should keep personally. The pickups look butt ugly also.
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:33 pm
by grayk
Jeff Rath - I am with you on this !
Sandberg - Yes they have copied the shape of the Ric. However that will be it. It isnt a neck through its a bolt on. It is also active with a 3 band EQ. Basically Its a Musicman Stingray soundalike but with the Ric looks. Is that a copy ? In my opinion no ? Its like the kit car of the 356 Speedster with a VW Beetle motor. It does everything well....looks like the speedster...but isnt one at all !
I have experience of this make. They are German and some of the finest made basses I have ever come across....they are amazing ! I would buy one too !
Re: Here we go again
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:07 pm
by jwr2
Sandbergs are like Sadowsky or Lakland basses in quality.