Page 1 of 2

Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:59 am
by kiramdear
My 320 dates from Aug. 82. Do I have the smaller or the larger headstock? I have the last photo for comparison but I'll be danged if I can say with certainty which one I've got.
I'm leaning toward smaller but can someone say for sure?

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:32 am
by collin
You have the smaller headstock (luckily!) Same as my Dec. '81 320

IMO, the large gumby headstock is terrible...and nice only on 50's style Rics- c58's and Capri's and only because they are historically accurate.

Cheers,
-Collin

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:19 am
by kiramdear
Thanks, Collin, I'm happy you said that. The difference is subtle to one who just hasn't seen enough ricks in person :D
When else did they use the larger?

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:14 am
by paologregorio
Defnitely not a Gumby. If the guitar has the old style Kluson type tuners, then it's not a Gumbyhead, with the exception of the C58, I think. :)

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:24 pm
by deaconblues
The '50s headstocks are nothing compared to the REAL Gumbys from the '70s...

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:20 pm
by deaconblues
Here's a real Gumby from the '81 catalog.

'50s headstocks aren't typically considered Gumbys...they came way before the era of Grover tuners.
cf75x-5.jpg

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:39 pm
by tennis_nick
an 05 330 currently in my possession is a MUCH bigger headstock than a 78 370, so 70's weren't that bad.

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:30 pm
by paologregorio
dpowell wrote:Here's a real Gumby from the '81 catalog.

'50s headstocks aren't typically considered Gumbys...they came way before the era of Grover tuners.
cf75x-5.jpg
Very true.

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:33 pm
by paologregorio
tennis_nick wrote:an 05 330 currently in my possession is a MUCH bigger headstock than a 78 370, so 70's weren't that bad.
I think 70s guitars still had the small headstock for the most part, didn't they? I thought Grovers, along with the larger, "Gumby" headstock, only came in after Klusons were unavailable.

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:09 pm
by jdogric12
They made guitars in the 70s? :lol:

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:12 pm
by deaconblues
jdogric12aolcom wrote:They made guitars in the 70s? :lol:
They were in disguise as basses!!

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:34 am
by blue330
Does the small headstock on my '82 330 make its butt look fat? I sort of think so! I know that the big headstocks are seen as sort of gross but now I think that on the hollowbody Rickenbackers they're more in proportion with these pretty big guitars. The large-ish head on my '06 330 looks pretty right, I think. Likewise I'm coming around the to the big, more-Bigsby-like head on the '72 Stratocaster. Headstock sizes seem to evolve sort of like lapel and tie widths, hemlines, and heel heights. Hmm, there's a term paper...

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:21 pm
by TheWonders
hmmm... Gumbyhead.... always learning something new at the RRF.

Does a 1999 340 have a Gumbyhead... inquiring minds want to know?

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:50 pm
by deaconblues
tbplayer wrote:hmmm... Gumbyhead.... always learning something new at the RRF.

Does a 1999 340 have a Gumbyhead... inquiring minds want to know?
Yep...I think they only switched back to smaller headstocks in '06 or '07.

Here's a modern 340 JG with the small headstock at Dave's Guitar:
34489.jpg

Re: Do I have a Gumbyhead?

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:21 am
by wayang
I think they all look like Gumby...
gumby-smiling.jpg