Page 1 of 1
4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:35 pm
by targ
Is it normal for a FL bass to be priced higher or lower than a fretted bass?
In other words, hypothetically speaking, would a 4003FL be more or less than say a normal 4003 priced at say...$1500 as a nice rounded figure?
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:58 pm
by cassius987
Should be the same, but trends in retail indicate otherwise.
Before the big price increases of late, I hit a store in St. Louis once, and they had a 4003FL for $2300. Don't know how they justified that one... at all.
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:08 pm
by cjj
Since the 4003FL is currently not being made, that might tend to drive prices up a bit.
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:23 pm
by targ
So, hypothetically speaking, a new 4003FL for $1500 is a good deal right?
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:26 pm
by cassius987
targ wrote:So, hypothetically speaking, a new 4003FL for $1500 is a good deal right?
It's not only a good deal, it's below the price of a new 4003. A new 4003 goes for $1900 these days.
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:28 pm
by antipodean
targ wrote:So, hypothetically speaking, a new 4003FL for $1500 is a good deal right?
From the Ric price list, 4003 RRP = $2159, So you'd be getting a 30% discount. Not too shabby in my books.
In the current market, you
may find a better deal if you try really hard, but the additional saving won't be huge!
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:45 pm
by shamustwin
So, tell where it is so we can try to steal it for that price.
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:28 pm
by targ
So, you noticed a lack of information?
Still trying to justify it in my mind...
Re: 4003FL
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:49 pm
by wints
A fretless is less coveted by most, and nearly always should be lower than a fretted bass.