Page 1 of 2

GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:25 am
by jps
Nice! :D

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 am
by servant
I love at around 4:12 on for a few seconds: eye contact and smiles between two mates, and we're still able to
share the enjoyment nearly 40 years on... :D

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:20 pm
by jimk
Thanks for posting that vid. It brought a smile to my face.

JimK

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:37 pm
by 1OUfan
Very cool! IMHO, George's voice was always under-appreciated during the Beatle years and his guitar work was always spot on. Is that Ringo on the drums as well?
Bob

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:44 pm
by jps
Yes, it is Ringo! :D

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:45 pm
by tennis_nick
1OUfan wrote:Very cool! IMHO, George's voice was always under-appreciated during the Beatle years and his guitar work was always spot on. Is that Ringo on the drums as well?
Bob
yessir.

John COULD Have been there, but George said No-Yoko, and Yoko said "No John"

Paul was invited, but he thought it would cause lots of legal problems to have them all there what with the bands divorce and all :lol:

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:38 pm
by kiramdear
Awesome show. 8)

I always thought Eric brought the wrong guitar. Shout-out to Jesse Ed Davis, Klaus Voorman, Jim Keltner, Leon Russell and Billy Preston, and so many more, and thanks to George for inventing the benefit concert as we know it.

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:54 pm
by tennis_nick
kiramdear wrote:Awesome show. 8)

I always thought Eric brought the wrong guitar. Shout-out to Jesse Ed Davis, Klaus Voorman, Jim Keltner, Leon Russell and Billy Preston, and so many more, and thanks to George for inventing the benefit concert as we know it.
Even Eric thought he brought the wrong guitar in retrospect!

WARNING WARNING WARNING

Cocaine and Alcohol adversely affect your tone.

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:28 pm
by sloop_john_b
I think it was heroin at that point, Nick. They had Eric booked on every single flight from London to NYC in the week leading up to the show, just hoping that he'd get on one of them (which he did).

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:40 pm
by tennis_nick
sloop_john_b wrote:I think it was heroin at that point, Nick. They had Eric booked on every single flight from London to NYC in the week leading up to the show, just hoping that he'd get on one of them (which he did).
Well, add that to the list then!

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:57 pm
by kiramdear
The Byrdland was weak. Eric should have played his SG for those shows, or a Paul. And bought a decent suit :P

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:04 am
by tennis_nick
kiramdear wrote:The Byrdland was weak. Eric should have played his SG for those shows, or a Paul. And bought a decent suit :P
That's funny, he specifically mentioned that he SHOULD have used a Solidbody Gibson!

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:15 am
by kiramdear
Well, if you listen to them trade licks the Strat sort of overwhelms the Byrdland. His playing is satisfactory but the pickups sound weak. Aren't they some kind of jazzy humbuckers?

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:29 am
by tennis_nick
kiramdear wrote:Well, if you listen to them trade licks the Strat sort of overwhelms the Byrdland. His playing is satisfactory but the pickups sound weak. Aren't they some kind of jazzy humbuckers?
In that era of Gibsons, there's an equal chance that they're wound super low or super high.

I have a feeling the mix we're hearing is more a choice of whoever did the mixing for the Album/Concert, but the tone sounding so "tiny" is more of a factor of the Byrdland being way big and prone to feedback in a R&R situation.

Re: GH & EC

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:41 am
by kiramdear
I think John's Casino with the P-90s would have cut it. Even an ES 335 would have been better, though more suited to blues than to George's work IMO.