Page 1 of 1
Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:20 am
by JakeK
Re: Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:38 pm
by deaconblues
The Janglebox sounds good with the CW. Is it my imagination, or is it adding a bit of reverb?
Re: Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:37 pm
by wmthor
I'm looking at his settings on the JangleBox and it seems that the Attack is between 2 and 3 o'clock while the Gain is at 9 o'clock. Am I right or do I need another appointment with the eye doctor?
Re: Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:43 pm
by Scastles
It's the Janglebox is much as it is the CW. I've had a JB for a few years. I'm not taking anything away from the CW, but the JB works well on any number of Ricks.
And yeah, Richard, it appears to be as you see it.
Re: Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:45 pm
by tennis_nick
Love the "Royer" McGuinn references!
I love world accents! It's aboot time they show em on youtube eh.
Re: Demo of a 360/12CW
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:24 pm
by RonLovesRic12strings
Yes, I agree, that the JangleBox will make any model of RIC 12 string sound better.
However, I also own a 360/12 CW, and it does have its own unique vibe. First of all, when played acoustically, the resultant sound is louder and more resonant than other modern-day RIC 12's. When amplified, this translates to a more open, "woodsier" tone. My 360/12 V64 has a similar tone, but not as pronounced as the CW.
Although I've never played a vintage RIC 12 string from the 1960's, my guess is that the CW comes close to the vintage tone of these 60's instruments.
And yes, I can hear some reverb in the YouTube demo.....probably coming from his amp or another pedal as the JangleBox pedal does not have a reverb component.
