Page 1 of 1
1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:54 pm
by joey_capps
now in Waterdown and it's mine!
It is in near mint condition. There is a small chip in the headstock near the high E tuner that I didn't notice until I got home, but now that I know it's there I can even see it in this photo (taken by the seller).
C'est la vie. At least I won't be the first to damage it. Otherwise, it is pristine.
Apparently, it spent the last 10 or so years in a closet, unplayed--attested to by very little fret-wear.
I think I prefer the look of the 610s to the 620s--perhaps because I now own one--especially the bodies. I like the softer, rounded edges compared to the shaper binding.
Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:30 pm
by kiramdear
Congratulations, Joey, that's a real beauty! I too prefer the rounded styling.

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:37 pm
by scotty
Lovely 610 congratulations.

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:47 pm
by doctorwho
scotty wrote:Lovely 610 congratulations.

+1! That's gorgeous!

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:35 pm
by bitzerguy
Nice grab Joey! Congrats. You'll have to bring it to the next Canadian get together.
Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:00 pm
by joey_capps
bitzerguy wrote:Nice grab Joey! Congrats. You'll have to bring it to the next Canadian get together.
Absolutely. Who knows, by then I might have a third . . . or a fourth . . . probably not a fifth

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:31 am
by Ontario_RIC_fan
joey_capps wrote:bitzerguy wrote:Nice grab Joey! Congrats. You'll have to bring it to the next Canadian get together.
Absolutely. Who knows, by then I might have a third . . . or a fourth . . . probably not a fifth

One can only dream!!! Congrats on teh guitar and don't forget to add it to the register...
Brian
Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:49 am
by wmthor
Congratulations! I presume it sounds as good as it looks.

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:56 am
by ozover50
Gorgeous, Joe...... congrats!!

Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:34 am
by joey_capps
wmthor wrote:Congratulations! I presume it sounds as good as it looks.

Yes! I played it through my Fender ProTube Twin at rehearsal last night, and it sounds great. From what I can tell, it doesn't have quite as much gain as my 360, hence less feedback and drive, but it seemed to be slightly mellower. I'll have to do a side-by-side comparison through the Fender someday but it's quite a climb to our rehearsal space (four long flights) and I usually only bring one guitar. They sound very similar through my little Gretsch Electromatic.
The twenty-one frets and dot inlays messed me up a couple of times last night. Once I simply ran out of frets--sorry can't play that chord on this guitar--and I kept playing things a tone lower. I'm sure I'll adjust though.
And, yes, Brian, I've added it to the register. I'm waiting for conformation.
Joe
Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:49 am
by 86kubicki
Its about time someone grabbed that - congrats Joey!
Re: 1995 Fireglo 610/6 no longer in Kingston . . .
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:31 pm
by doctorwho
joey_capps wrote:... Once I simply ran out of frets--sorry can't play that chord on this guitar ...
Yikes! That must be one heck of a chord up that far!
