Page 1 of 3
4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:30 pm
by berth
Well, not actually 4005 differences. But some differences between 2 4005's.
We (Chris P, loves4003 and I) had sort of a Dutch mini confluence today as you can see here:
And we noticed some differences between ChrisP's 4005 and my 4005. Especially the heel of the neck and where the fretboard ends in relation to the body.
Another peculiar thing is stringlength. When keeping both basses next to eachother with both nuts at the same height Chris's bass had the bridge a lot lower than my 4005 has.

Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:30 pm
by jps
The WB does not have a Rick bridge, that is an aftermarket bridge by...
Can you get us better, detailed photos of that bridge?
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:06 pm
by loves4003
That first picture needs more Rickenbackers.
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:27 pm
by berth
jps wrote:The WB does not have a Rick bridge, that is an aftermarket bridge by...
Can you get us better, detailed photos of that bridge?
If memory serves me right it is a Rick bridge with a different base plate. I still should be in the same position I think, Shouldnt it?
Chris should have better pictures. Maybe he can dial in....
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:28 pm
by berth
loves4003 wrote:That first picture needs more Rickenbackers.
The horror. We forgot my 2 Rickenbacker Amps.

Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:33 pm
by Chris P
Yep, it's a Ric bridge (without the chrome cover which Berth's has) on a newer brass plate. Mine has some issues.
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:21 pm
by doctorwho
Thanks for the pictures, Bert! I love that the cat was standing guard on the basses, too!

Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:30 pm
by windchimp
Great pic Bert! Quite the herd!!!
doctorwho wrote:Thanks for the pictures, Bert! I love that the cat was standing guard on the basses, too!

Looks like kitty is also contemplating the bridges...mew - that looks funky - meow!

Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:33 pm
by weemac
loves4003 wrote:That first picture needs more Rickenbackers.
That first picture needs more Pussycats!
Eden.
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:34 pm
by Benjamin
Kitty sez: If I waits patiently all these Rickenbackers will gives me my couch back!
Kitty sez: Wants to walk all over this blue Rickenbacker but my slave has already scalded me once! *waits for newspaper*
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:58 pm
by jps
Chris P wrote:Yep, it's a Ric bridge (without the chrome cover which Berth's has) on a newer brass plate. Mine has some issues.
The saddles on that bridge are not original or Rick-O-Like at all, those certainly have been changed out, also. Nor are the adjustment screws and nuts, they too, are different looking.
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:05 pm
by jps
Here is a crummy

shot of mine.
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:35 am
by Chris P
I'll make a detail shot of the bridge ASAP.
But what about the different neck placing of both basses? Normal voor 4005s vs 4005WBs?
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:51 am
by marc61
loves4003 wrote:That first picture needs more Rickenbackers.
maybe, but I did notice a kitten-backer
Re: 4005 differences
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:33 am
by jps
Chris P wrote:I'll make a detail shot of the bridge ASAP.
But what about the different neck placing of both basses? Normal voor 4005s vs 4005WBs?
My '67 4005WB has a neck heel similar to the MG WB in your photo, but maybe just a tiny bit shorter, with the fingerboard is cut flush to the inner edge of the binding.