Page 1 of 1
Different take on intonation!
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:40 pm
by jps
Truly
different!!!

Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:52 pm
by schoolside
that's some crazy fret job! I wonder what kind of saw they use

Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:07 pm
by jingle_jangle
Oh, the nut cases are out again. This should cause a buzz at NAMM, then disappear...
The full utility of this idea is captured by the statement that the frets are "optimized for all standard open and barre chord patterns". To which I can only reply, "Really? All of them?"
Last night I watched one of the last great bossa nova guitarists, Oscar Castro-Neves, do his thing up and down a classical guitar's unradiused nylon-stringed fretboard, for a solid ninety minutes, fingers flying and odd chords ringing out so fast that I couldn't keep track, just closed my eyes and let the music wash over me...
There is simply NO WAY that this can be perfectly intonated for every chord, so they qualify things to "standard". Well, 95% of what Oscar was playing was not "standard". Not that he's their market, you understand. So who is, exactly?
This is a rhythm guitar that just might sound perfect to a dog of a certain breed on a clear day of certain humidity, in the shade, with no finger pressing down too much or too little, new strings, and of a very specific gauge. In other words, perfection requires perfection. But the darned thing isn't perfect to begin with, just a closer approximation of perfection that few of us will ever need.
What we have here is overdevelopment to the Nth degree...way overthought...too much time on somebody's hands, coupled with the egocentric hope that enough people will want this sort of thing, to make all this nonsense a worthwhile pastime.
And, for gosh sakes, how do you string bend?
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:17 pm
by jps
The author notwithstanding,
this is an interesting counterpoint.
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:43 am
by beatlefreak
I don't think I could stand a guitar with frets that looked like that.
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:13 am
by longhouse
Guitar Player gave it a nice endorsement.
Good idea? yes
Innovative? yes
Will you see it standard on any guitar ever? no
Will you see it slung round the neck of an A-list player ever? no
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:14 am
by jps
beatlefreak wrote:I don't think I could stand a guitar with frets that looked like that.
I take it you are not a fan of melted watches, also?

Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:19 am
by beatlefreak
Actually, I'm a big fan of surrealistic art. But Dali and guitars don't have anything in common.
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:39 am
by doctorwho
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:31 am
by beatlefreak
Yes - Turn your guitar into an autoharp...
Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:16 am
by collin
They say it doesn't affect string bending.
.........yeeeeah, right.

Re: Different take on intonation!
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:25 am
by jps
beatlefreak wrote:.....Dali and guitars don't have anything in common.