Page 1 of 2

A bit before our time

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:33 pm
by jps
Very hip!

I know this is not '70s but this is great, especially Tim's initial moves! :shock: :lol:

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:54 pm
by winston
Yes they were cool but I had never seen those moves before. That was hilarious Tim. :lol:

I saw them open for Jimi Hendrix on September 7, 1968 at the Pacific Coliseum in Vancouver Canada. Soft Machine was on first followed by Vanilla Fudge and then of course Jimi.

So yeah I was there and I remember the 60's. Go figure. :lol:

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:36 pm
by beatlefreak
I love the go-go dancers trying to keep in time with that cut!
:lol:

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:42 am
by jimk
Yup, that takes me back. After that song hit the charts, I really began to like the sound of the Hammond B3.
JimK

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:19 am
by longhouse
Wow... that is one ugly band. Been a while since I'd seen any footage of the VF.
A cursory glance at their discography shows they did heaps of covers in the early days (Zombies, lots of Beatles, more than one Sonny Bono song, Donovan, etc.)

A few things are immediate:

1. what a cool guitar (anyone know the model?)

2. what a ridiculous bunch of antics by the bassist (painful to watch)

3. what a ridiculous wizard/space/Vincent Price cape on the bassist

4. what a ridiculous hairstyle on the bassist

5. what a cool organ sound

6. those poor go go dancers

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:18 am
by jps
So, I take it you don't much care for Tim Bogert? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:36 am
by rickenbrother
Good stuff! I've met Carmine Appice (drummer) several times over the past few years. Other than his hair being a little longer, he still looks exactly the same.

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:47 am
by Bighouse
longhouse wrote:Wow... that is one ugly band. Been a while since I'd seen any footage of the VF.
A cursory glance at their discography shows they did heaps of covers in the early days (Zombies, lots of Beatles, more than one Sonny Bono song, Donovan, etc.)
A few things are immediate:
1. what a cool guitar (anyone know the model?)
2. what a ridiculous bunch of antics by the bassist (painful to watch)
3. what a ridiculous wizard/space/Vincent Price cape on the bassist
4. what a ridiculous hairstyle on the bassist
5. what a cool organ sound
6. those poor go go dancers
So you're saying you really dug it?

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:05 am
by longhouse
Hey, that organ sounds ace! The Fudge were always a bit to leaden sounding to me. Should have been called the Vanilla Sludge.
Still, I recognize the talent in the band. Carmen's name (and his brother's) come up regularly in drummer circles. Funny, they pronounce Appice differently from each other!

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:22 am
by peewee
longhouse wrote:
what a cool guitar (anyone know the model?)
It's a Gibson L-5 w a Florentine (sharp) cutaway. Could be a Byrdland, but the thicker body and tailpiece style suggest that it is an L-5, probably from the mid 1960s.

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:05 pm
by royclough
one of my favourites from 60s but am I right in thinking that the released version started with the organ and not the frenzy that preceded it.

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:14 pm
by winston
Yes that was the version that I remember also Roy.

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:05 pm
by longhouse
Thanks Mike. It didn't look a straight L5. Probably worth a mint -even then!

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:43 pm
by jps
An L5 is an unusual choice for a Psychodelic® '60s band.

Re: A bit before our time

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:41 am
by beatlefreak
royclough wrote:one of my favourites from 60s but am I right in thinking that the released version started with the organ and not the frenzy that preceded it.
Actually, the album version did start with the frenzy, and was even preceded by a short drum/bass part. I have a copy of it.