Your Favorite Strings--for FRETLESS!
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:37 pm
Naturally this discussion should be open not only to flats but to rounds as well... there've gotta be some folks out there using nickel rounds or half-rounds on their FLs. If this thread goes well, hopefully it can become a repository of detailed info for people new to string selection for fretless bass.
Basically I'd like it to somewhat follow this format:
"X Strings are my favorite. I have also used Y and Z Strings. Here is why I like X Strings over the others, or the trouble I may have run into with the others."
Also be sure to report gauges. D'Addario Chromes that are gauged 40-55-75-95 are a whole different animal from an 50-70-85-105 set even with the same construction method for each. The added tension and changes to the relief and action (if not entirely removed in a setup) can change the tone a lot.
Now since I started this, I'll chip in my part... and hope that the rest of you do as well.
---
LaBella Deep Talkin' Flats gauged 43-60-82-104 are my absolute favorite strings for fretless to date. They have a little bit of extra stiffness in their feel and are extremely well balanced "out of the box". They have a bit of bright sizzle when you dig in and have a lot more "fretless growl" to them than other string sets I have played, which come off as plunky by comparison. They also sustain amazingly well. Certain places on my 4003FL that seemed like mild dead spots before don't even register now. And the tone they generate is very hi-fi, like unto Michael Manring to my ears. These strings are also the only flatwounds I have found that truly respond to a pick well, because they have some much growl in them.
I have also tried D'Addario Chromes (in this order: 45-65-80-100, 40-60-80-100, 45-60-80-105). I definitely appreciated many qualities of these strings such as their taut low-end response that the LaBellas also have... it allows one to create some very crisp-yet-warm sounding recordings. These were the first strings I tried on my 4003FL that caused me to think it could truly sound identical to an upright with the right setup and sound engineering. However I eventually grew tired of them because of how plunky they got over time, and because D'Addario did not offer the 45-60-80-105 set that I found so well balanced and stopped offering to sell me singles. These are definitely good strings, but I have moved on to LaBellas for now. I have noted that Jeff uses a 40-55-75-95 set and my calculations on it are that it is fairly well balanced as well, so if I ever go back to Chromes (doubtful but who knows) I may give that set a shot.
Lastly, the very first strings I used on my fretless were TI JF344s (gauges 43-56-70-100). They have a very high reputation so I figured I couldn't go wrong. I played and gigged with them for around 6 months, doing a lot of live shows, and truly they served me very well. However, when the time came to go back into the studio, I was really disappointed with their low-end response. I had not noticed it live so much, but the low strings came across muddy and fairly undefined. They did not have any crisp attack to distinguish the notes; one listener commented that one of my recordings had the bass sounding more like a trombone. But I don't mean to be overly negative. These strings are definitely great, I just wish they were another 5-10% better than they are for my needs at this time. If I had my way, TIs would be offered in a 43-56-75ish-105ish set. As it stands now, there is too much of a difference in tension between the two lowest and two highest strings for my liking.
---
Okay... there's my 2 cents. Now I'd like to hear what the rest of RRF thinks...
Basically I'd like it to somewhat follow this format:
"X Strings are my favorite. I have also used Y and Z Strings. Here is why I like X Strings over the others, or the trouble I may have run into with the others."
Also be sure to report gauges. D'Addario Chromes that are gauged 40-55-75-95 are a whole different animal from an 50-70-85-105 set even with the same construction method for each. The added tension and changes to the relief and action (if not entirely removed in a setup) can change the tone a lot.
Now since I started this, I'll chip in my part... and hope that the rest of you do as well.
---
LaBella Deep Talkin' Flats gauged 43-60-82-104 are my absolute favorite strings for fretless to date. They have a little bit of extra stiffness in their feel and are extremely well balanced "out of the box". They have a bit of bright sizzle when you dig in and have a lot more "fretless growl" to them than other string sets I have played, which come off as plunky by comparison. They also sustain amazingly well. Certain places on my 4003FL that seemed like mild dead spots before don't even register now. And the tone they generate is very hi-fi, like unto Michael Manring to my ears. These strings are also the only flatwounds I have found that truly respond to a pick well, because they have some much growl in them.
I have also tried D'Addario Chromes (in this order: 45-65-80-100, 40-60-80-100, 45-60-80-105). I definitely appreciated many qualities of these strings such as their taut low-end response that the LaBellas also have... it allows one to create some very crisp-yet-warm sounding recordings. These were the first strings I tried on my 4003FL that caused me to think it could truly sound identical to an upright with the right setup and sound engineering. However I eventually grew tired of them because of how plunky they got over time, and because D'Addario did not offer the 45-60-80-105 set that I found so well balanced and stopped offering to sell me singles. These are definitely good strings, but I have moved on to LaBellas for now. I have noted that Jeff uses a 40-55-75-95 set and my calculations on it are that it is fairly well balanced as well, so if I ever go back to Chromes (doubtful but who knows) I may give that set a shot.
Lastly, the very first strings I used on my fretless were TI JF344s (gauges 43-56-70-100). They have a very high reputation so I figured I couldn't go wrong. I played and gigged with them for around 6 months, doing a lot of live shows, and truly they served me very well. However, when the time came to go back into the studio, I was really disappointed with their low-end response. I had not noticed it live so much, but the low strings came across muddy and fairly undefined. They did not have any crisp attack to distinguish the notes; one listener commented that one of my recordings had the bass sounding more like a trombone. But I don't mean to be overly negative. These strings are definitely great, I just wish they were another 5-10% better than they are for my needs at this time. If I had my way, TIs would be offered in a 43-56-75ish-105ish set. As it stands now, there is too much of a difference in tension between the two lowest and two highest strings for my liking.
---
Okay... there's my 2 cents. Now I'd like to hear what the rest of RRF thinks...