Page 1 of 3

Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:46 pm
by loopyreed
Am I the only one who thinks Rickenbackers look really good with significant wear? I'm not talking about abuse, but honest wear and lots of it. Anybody got any pictures of some well-loved Rickenbackers?

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:50 pm
by pfflam
I think they look OK beat up . . . but I would be sad to see a 'relic' fad with Rics . . . they seem sorta above that whole thang

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:06 pm
by Len
I think any guitar looks better with real use. Not that relic BS. I recently bought a white 360 partly because I wanted a 360, partly because it was a good deal, and partly because it looks really cool with yellowed and cracked finish and a bit of finish rubbed off in just the right way.

On the other hand, I understand why others like pristine examples and I respect that. I won't buy a pristine older guitar because I know that the way I play I will beat the **** out of it.

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:20 am
by libratune
Here's one of our recently discussed beat up Ricks, discussed on this thread: viewtopic.php?f=22&t=394042
1962 365 FG front
1962 365 FG front
1962 365 FG back
1962 365 FG back

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:40 am
by loopyreed
libratune wrote:Here's one of our recently discussed beat up Ricks, discussed on this thread: viewtopic.php?f=22&t=394042
2.jpg
3.jpg
Yes. Perfect. This is how older guitars should look - and this is not how a brand new guitar should look. File me under anti-relic.

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:02 am
by jingle_jangle
Count me anti-relic, too.

But then, you knew that already... :wink: :wink:

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:06 am
by ozover50
We did?

:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:13 am
by collin
Here's my '64 Rose Morris 1998:
RM1998-01.jpg
RM1998-04.jpg
RM1998-02.jpg


In my opinion------it has the perfect amount of wear around the edges. Checked/crazed finish, worn sides, fits like a glove. I won't pay more for this "feature," but i'd pick it over a mint example any day (if they were the same price).

You collectors can keep the minty examples, I like em like a well-worn and comfortable! (and they usually play better like this as well...)

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:45 am
by Rick2005
+1 :)

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:47 am
by doctorwho
Here are a few of the wear patterns on my 1967 RM3261.
RM3261FG-1.jpg
P5040494.JPG
P5040497.JPG
P5040487A.JPG

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:09 am
by libratune
Here's a couple of mid-'60s Ricks that show honest playing wear:
4005 MG 1965
4005 MG 1965
And what is it with these 1998s (or, um, 345Ss)? Some models get all the play:
1998 FG 1967
1998 FG 1967

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:56 am
by badeggs
This 4000 has the coolest wear ever:
Image

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:53 am
by collin
libratune wrote: And what is it with these 1998s (or, um, 345Ss)? Some models get all the play:

Shows how great they are! :)

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:25 am
by jingle_jangle
Each one superb, with lots of love and tales to tell!

Re: Show me some beat-up Ricks

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:16 pm
by billydlight
I've always felt an old guitar with no wear is a sad thing. Basically says no one loved it. And an unloved guitar is a terrible awful thing. :(