New Rics vs Old

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

jack1953
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:46 pm

New Rics vs Old

Post by jack1953 »

Trying to learn as I go.......I see a brand new 4003 goes for 1949.99 at Music123. Yet they have old 4003s selling on Ebay starting at 1500 and 1600 with Buy It Now for 2000. Is this common for Rics? Why would anyone want to pay as much, or nearly as much, for a 20 year old Ric when they can get the very same model brand new?
Is it just Rics or is that the norm? Would 20 year old Fender PBass sell for as much as the new ones?
Jack
Basses
ESP B-204SM
Schecter Stiletto Extreme
ESP B-104
Amps
GK MB210
Ampeg BA115
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by jps »

I thought you were going to compare new vs. old Ricks. :roll: Say, 1973 to a 2008, for example. :wink: Come on over and you can try them out. :D
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by cjj »

Sometimes it comes down to how long you want to wait. Often dealers list instruments they have on order but may not have in stock, so someone may be willing to pay more for a used instrument to get one sooner.

Then there are things like color. Certain colors simply are not available anymore, so people pay more to get them.

There are all sorts of reasons people might be willing to pay more for a used instrument over a new one, including stupidity...
:roll: :lol:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by antipodean »

Just remember - folk outside North America have to pay a lot more than US street price for a new Rick - even after factoring in the shipping, as the distributors take their cut. As a result, the offshore price for a used Rick can be higher than the US street price for a new Rick, as US dealers can't sell new Ricks into the offshore market by virtue of the various distribution agreements between RIC and the regional distributors....
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
AdamBomb
New member
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:27 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by AdamBomb »

On a similar vein, when exactly is a ric considered vintage and not just old? I'm seeing a 1985 white 4003 that cost 1895 as opposed to a new jetglo ric priced a couple hundred less. Is this just a matter of color or is the age of the wood likely to be a factor in tone?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by jps »

AdamBomb wrote:On a similar vein, when exactly is a ric considered vintage and not just old?
That, in itself, can be a very long and heated debate! :wink:
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by FretlessOnly »

And it's not just the age of the wood. As the varnish ages, it tends to get a bit thinner and allows the wood to speak a bit more (thanks Joshua). I wonder if a mapleglo would have more wood sound over time than a colored finish, since the color would be another layer that the MG wouldn't have. Or am I out of my tree here?
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
AdamBomb
New member
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:27 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by AdamBomb »

jps wrote:
AdamBomb wrote:On a similar vein, when exactly is a ric considered vintage and not just old?
That, in itself, can be a very long and heated debate! :wink:
Yeah I keep feeling like 1973 is considered some sort of special year, although I'm not sure why that is outside of the fact that they were doing checkerboard at that point. Does the wood gain x% badassitude/year that is unnoticeable to the human ear until after a certain threshold is achieved? This has something to do with the wood fully drying, right? Maybe I should buy a new ric and leave it out in the sun for several weeks and speed the process up considerably! Instant vintage tone!

Edit: Please don't take the above statement seriously please! :lol:
FretlessOnly wrote:And it's not just the age of the wood. As the varnish ages, it tends to get a bit thinner and allows the wood to speak a bit more (thanks Joshua). I wonder if a mapleglo would have more wood sound over time than a colored finish, since the color would be another layer that the MG wouldn't have. Or am I out of my tree here?
Wouldn't it just make sense to make rics with thinner varnish then if that's the case?
User avatar
Paolo
New member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:16 pm

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by Paolo »

antipodean wrote:Just remember - folk outside North America have to pay a lot more than US street price for a new Rick - even after factoring in the shipping, as the distributors take their cut. As a result, the offshore price for a used Rick can be higher than the US street price for a new Rick, as US dealers can't sell new Ricks into the offshore market by virtue of the various distribution agreements between RIC and the regional distributors....
I paid £1780 ($2,731.20) shipped for my 2010 4003 JG...and that was a reasonably priced one with no waiting list...Expensive,but worth every penny.
...and on the 8th day,God created Rickenbacker.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by jps »

Some tests have shown that vibration is a factor in the aging/better tone process, as in playing the instrument. So, you better be out there in the sun playing the bass constantly; don't forget you sunblock, hat and sunglasses.

My '73 is considerably lighter in weight than the '08, sometimes I think moisture content does have something to do with it a bit.
User avatar
windchimp
Intermediate Member
Posts: 737
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:18 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by windchimp »

jps wrote:
AdamBomb wrote:On a similar vein, when exactly is a ric considered vintage and not just old?
That, in itself, can be a very long and heated debate! :wink:
Yeah Jeff - I'll take that old black thing off your hands...what are friends for? :lol:
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by jps »

But, mon frère, it a vintage black thing, not an old black thing. :roll: :mrgreen: :lol: :twisted:
AdamBomb
New member
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:27 am

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by AdamBomb »

jps wrote:Some tests have shown that vibration is a factor in the aging/better tone process, as in playing the instrument. So, you better be out there in the sun playing the bass constantly; don't forget you sunblock, hat and sunglasses.

My '73 is considerably lighter in weight than the '08, sometimes I think moisture content does have something to do with it a bit.
If I was a smarter person I would invent a robot to play the yes discography a couple million times at high speed in the blazing hot sun and save myself the work of breaking it in. Maybe i can talk to this guy to help me: http://www.capturedbyrobots.com/
jack1953
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by jack1953 »

Basses
ESP B-204SM
Schecter Stiletto Extreme
ESP B-104
Amps
GK MB210
Ampeg BA115
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: New Rics vs Old

Post by cjj »

Yep! You can pay all sorts of crazy prices for vintage.

Then again, the last Rick bass I bought, I paid over $4500 for, and it was brand spankin' new... :mrgreen:

So perhaps I fall into the stupid category...
:roll: :lol: :lol:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”