Page 1 of 2

"EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:49 am
by jingle_jangle

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:11 am
by longhouse
$1950.00... does Johnny's spirit inhabit the guitar?

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:21 am
by cjj
Aw heck, a little superglue and it'll be good as new...
:twisted:

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:28 am
by Scastles
What a real shame.

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:04 am
by jimk
Oh yeah, that's one of those guitars where they put the decimal point in the price in the wrong place. :lol: :lol: :lol:
JimK

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:17 am
by Dave12
"Yes, but it's a DRY heat..."

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:46 am
by chrisdski
Here's Elderly's description of Excellent Condition, as this guitar is described as. Maybe they consider the separated headstock a finish crack?

Excellent Condition : Very clean, might have some minor wear, dings, scratches, or finish cracks, but otherwise very close to new condition.

http://www.elderly.com/vintage/abbreviations.html

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:01 pm
by ken_j
Don't shoot the messenger. Personally I don't agree with their current condition standards.
Exceptions
We also often will give you the cosmetic rating and then qualify it by stating "except . . ." The exceptions may sound as if the rating should be in a lower category. Technically that may be correct...

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:22 pm
by cjj
ken_j wrote:Don't shoot the messenger. Personally I don't agree with their current condition standards.
Exceptions
We also often will give you the cosmetic rating and then qualify it by stating "except . . ." The exceptions may sound as if the rating should be in a lower category. Technically that may be correct...
Those exceptions don't exactly cover this one, to continue
Technically that may be correct, but we find that if, for example, we rate a beautifully clean guitar as "GC" because it has a 1" repaired side crack that is hard to see, it gives the incorrect impression of the guitar...

What we are saying is that cosmetically this is a really nice guitar but we want you to know that it is not absolutely perfect.
Yeah, cosmetically, it's really nice, but not even close to perfect...

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:08 pm
by scott_s
So Elderly expects to get more money for it in broken condition than if they invested in some repairs? :?

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:44 pm
by cjj
scott_s wrote:So Elderly expects to get more money for it in broken condition than if they invested in some repairs? :?
Yeah, it's not like it was broken by Pete Townshend...
:roll: :lol:

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:19 pm
by jps
EC? :shock:

What is their definition of VG condition? :lol:

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:41 pm
by windchimp
A little duct tape and she'll be good to go! :twisted:

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:11 pm
by 86kubicki
So what would one of these go for if the headstock was actually attached to the rest of the guitar?

Re: "EC, EXCEPT NEEDS WORK..."

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:40 pm
by Halbert
86kubicki wrote:So what would one of these go for if the headstock was actually attached to the rest of the guitar?
I have a 2009 price guide that says $3400 in excellent condition...