What is the difference between these 2 guitars?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:53 am
Not much actually, apart from about £2000!
One, as you know is a Gibson 335, which will cost you about £2500 here in the UK.
The other is made by a local luthier who sells them for £140!
The only modification that it probably needs is a better quality bridge, which he is happy to source and install.
The electronics are fine, similar in quality to the Kent Armstrongs, and in terms of tone, I couldn't tell the difference between the Gibson and this.
The body is constructed the same way as a Gibson with 3 layers of veneer.
He meticulously checks every guitar he sells, making sure that every fret is perfect and that the guitar plays like an absolute dream.
These guitars stomp all over Epiphones with big boots on, and they're so close to to Gibsons that I see no reason to pay the extra £2000+ for the badge.
Thoughts?
One, as you know is a Gibson 335, which will cost you about £2500 here in the UK.
The other is made by a local luthier who sells them for £140!
The only modification that it probably needs is a better quality bridge, which he is happy to source and install.
The electronics are fine, similar in quality to the Kent Armstrongs, and in terms of tone, I couldn't tell the difference between the Gibson and this.
The body is constructed the same way as a Gibson with 3 layers of veneer.
He meticulously checks every guitar he sells, making sure that every fret is perfect and that the guitar plays like an absolute dream.
These guitars stomp all over Epiphones with big boots on, and they're so close to to Gibsons that I see no reason to pay the extra £2000+ for the badge.
Thoughts?
