Page 1 of 2
Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:11 pm
by octagon
This
Ryder 425 has to be worth $500.How come nobody bid on it?

Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:13 pm
by libratune
Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:17 pm
by octagon
libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
Ok,thanks Ron.Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:08 pm
by clementc3
octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.
In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."
Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.
In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:14 pm
by Danotron
The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:51 pm
by 8mileshigher
I think the TRC on these Ryder guitars is somewhat of a detractor

with it's shape and the script writing.
I guess I like the regular Ric TRC too much, to appreciate these private label alternatives.
All in all, the FG finish on that guitar does not look too bad for its age.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:58 pm
by BuddyDog
Danotron wrote:The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.

Must be the Meg Whitman effect...
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:48 pm
by octagon
clementc3 wrote:octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.
In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."
Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.
In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.
Are the Electros different from the Ryders?

Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:36 pm
by libratune
The comparable Electro model would be the ES-17, which usually had a set-neck, though there are also neck-thru Electros. The Ryder in the ebay ad is a neck-thru:

- Ryder 425 back
The TRCs look to be about the same shape:

- Ryder 425 TRC
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:22 am
by octagon
Pretty much.

Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:30 am
by libratune
Of course, there is the occasional exception:

- ES-17 Electro TRC
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:11 pm
by octagon
libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
ES-17 64 425 Electro TRC.jpg
Maybe that is what Rickenbacker gives you as a replacement when you trade in a broken "Electro" TRC.

Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:17 pm
by electrofaro
libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
I hate when that happens! I was tracking a 250 and was mightily confused it was listed under ended when I came home - turns out it was ended early.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:49 pm
by Malchik
Ha, ha. I made arrangement with him to ship to Canada if I won. I figured he had a great offer sent to him.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:14 pm
by jingle_jangle
libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
ES-17 64 425 Electro TRC.jpg
Ryder TRCs were about 3/4" shorter than the Electro ones (the name is 2 letters shorter). The Electro ones made using the lap steel metal logo tags were on very early ESs and are rare, although not too pretty.