Page 1 of 1

Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:29 pm
by fireglo67
Browsing through the excellent Register I noticed that Rickenbacker have never produced any kind of model with an associated number in the 500's. I wonder why. Superstition? Saving it for something special? :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:39 pm
by cjj
Sure they did. There were the Console 500 Series steel guitars...

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:45 pm
by fireglo67
cjj wrote:Sure they did. There were the Console 500 Series steel guitars...
Aye, but it's the 'Console 500' not the '500 Console' isn't it?
*he mumbles, in a very poor attempt to hide his embarrasment*

I'll get my coat...... :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:56 pm
by cjj
:lol: :lol: :lol: :roll:
Well, they do actually refer to several models without using the "Console" prefix in the old catalogs...

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:42 pm
by winston
cjj wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :roll:
Well, they do actually refer to several models without using the "Console" prefix in the old catalogs...
Rob got his coat and left CJ :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:02 pm
by cjj
I was just slammin' the door behind him...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:06 am
by scotty
Well that was fast..... :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:09 am
by kiramdear
We still love you, Rob. :)

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:57 am
by cjj
+1! :D

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:29 pm
by fireglo67
Don't worry, you'll get your CD's soon...... :lol:

Re: Why no 500's?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:30 pm
by scotty
Id advise to listen for ticking guys! :twisted: