Page 1 of 1
4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:10 am
by cangaroo
Hi all there.
How changed 4001 V63 specs over the years of production ?
For example if i remember correctly early models had hotter pick ups than the current, or am i wrong ?
Thank you
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:46 am
by wim
What I know about:
Very early models had real magnetic HS pickups
Headstocks changed around 1997
Pickup surround changed continuously
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:59 pm
by Ivan3000
I'd love some real magnetic shoes!

Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:20 pm
by coolhandjjl
Neck thickness varied, and I believe the height of the fretboard over the body changed as well. I really love the thin neck on the most recent 4001c64's, but the reversed headstock was a deal breaker for me.
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:39 pm
by cangaroo
Seem that a lot of people seem uncomfortable with reverse headstock.
Talking about reverse headstock, y luthier told me that probably the E string would suffer of the reverse headstock because of the diminuished length between the nut and the keywind, but hearing Mc Cartney recordings (for example) you can hear how the E string sound full and fat.
Anyway about the pick up i read somewhere (i guess in this forum but i can't remember the 3d) that at a certain point reissue 4001 basses (both V63 and C64 i guess) had toaster winded at some hotter values than the current production ... what years spanned this kind of production ?
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:16 pm
by jps
IvanMunoz wrote:I'd love some real magnetic shoes!

Check in with NASA.

Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:21 pm
by coolhandjjl
cangaroo wrote:......Talking about reverse headstock, y luthier told me that probably the E string would suffer of the reverse headstock because of the diminuished length between the nut and the keywind, but hearing Mc Cartney recordings (for example) you can hear how the E string sound full and fat.....
Hard to say if that was an issue. Lots of post effects at Abbey Road. I read that he often used two compressors daisy chained.
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:15 pm
by Ivan3000
jps wrote:IvanMunoz wrote:I'd love some real magnetic shoes!

Check in with NASA.

Or these limited releases from nike for The MJF foundation

Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:09 pm
by cangaroo
coolhandjjl wrote:Hard to say if that was an issue. Lots of post effects at Abbey Road. I read that he often used two compressors daisy chained.
Intersting ... can you remember the source ?
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:45 pm
by jps
cangaroo wrote:coolhandjjl wrote:Hard to say if that was an issue. Lots of post effects at Abbey Road. I read that he often used two compressors daisy chained.
Intersting ... can you remember the source ?
This is well known about multiple compressors; these days that is a common thing to do. One sourse would be Geoff Emerick, another is very probably George Martin.
Re: 4001 V63 Specs over the years
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:05 am
by Tigger
There's a number of references to use of Fairchild compressors at Abbey Road in Andy Babiuk's "Beatles Gear" (2001, Backbeat), but no mention of multiple compressors, for what it's worth.