Page 1 of 1
Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:37 am
by ricksrick11
I was interested in knowing what these guitars sound like. They have a short scale and no sound hole, so I would imagine they sound similar to a 325. Anyone know or care to post a video on youtube? There are literally none on there which is a shame.
I also saw the model with only one pickup and it had a pickup selector. What is with that?
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:57 am
by jdogric12
The ones with a 2-way are a kind of bass boost (up to '63, I think). The ones with 3-way ('64 fwd IIRC) are three positions: tone all the way up, tone all the way down, and tone knob in play.
They sound like spanky little 325's. There is a pretty significant difference in the sound of alder ones (again, -->'63 IIRC) versus maple ones ('64 fwd, IIRC).
If you can get your hands on RickResource Forum CD Volume 1, my song (He Showed Up in May, She Left in June) features a 1000 on the solo. The 1000 sounds a little different since its pu is in the middle position rather than at the bridge like a 900.
Love me some tulips!!!
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:57 pm
by ricksrick11
There is a pretty significant difference in the sound of alder ones (again, -->'63 IIRC) versus maple ones ('64 fwd, IIRC).
The one I'm looking at is a November '63 so that'd make it alder I guess. What are the tonal differences between the two types of wood?
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:45 am
by ricksrick11
I just won the 1964 900 on ebay. This will be my first Rickenbacker. The guy that sold it to me said that the intonation needed to be adjusted. Does anyone know how action adjustment and intonation work on this bridge?
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:10 pm
by Ivan3000
ricksrick11 wrote:I just won the 1964 900 on ebay. This will be my first Rickenbacker. The guy that sold it to me said that the intonation needed to be adjusted. Does anyone know how action adjustment and intonation work on this bridge?
Congrats!
I love shortscale instruments.

Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:20 pm
by jdogric12
Whether it's '63 or '64 will make a big difference. If it's alder, it will be much lighter and have far less sustain. Otherwise, maple, sustain. Bridges are fixed on these so there is not much you can do. Shoot me detailed pics and I'll help you assess. PM sent re email.
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 am
by ricksrick11
jdogric12 wrote:Whether it's '63 or '64 will make a big difference. If it's alder, it will be much lighter and have far less sustain. Otherwise, maple, sustain. Bridges are fixed on these so there is not much you can do. Shoot me detailed pics and I'll help you assess. PM sent re email.
I can post some pics up on here when the guitar gets here. It will arrive here on the 14th or the 15th. What I am hoping is that the guy has a set of normal gauge strings on the guitar which would cause the incorrect intonation. From the few pictures I have seen of the bridge close up it looks like there are two holes on either side of the bridge and the bridge is floating. These aren't for bridge adjustment? Thanks for the information so far guys. I'll most likely put a video up on youtube demoing the guitar seeing as one does not exist.
Re: Rickenbacker 900/950
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:27 am
by doctorwho
Congrats, Joe!
The bridge should look like this one on my 450v63:
If the height adjustment screws are missing, the holes may have been stripped.
BTW, it would not surprise me that the guitar will come with the wrong gauge strings that are the cause for lack of correct intonation, as I have seen this more than once with short scale Rickenbackers that i have bought.