Page 1 of 1

'86 360 vs. '08 330

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:59 pm
by pocaloc
I have a chance to buy an '86 jetglo 360 for $125 less than an '08 fireglo 330 both are excellent examples of the jetglo and fireglo finishes. The 330 is mint and the 86 360 is in excellent/very good shape with nice aged binding and inlays, plus it has the cool older case. Is there any reason to go with one over the other? I love fire glow when it's done right, but black....er jetglo is up there as far as finishes go for me. I love binding too. As far as the age goes, is one better than the other? I eventually want to get toasters, and would have more of a problem cutting into the '86. Oh well, now I'm rambling. Advice?

Re: '86 360 vs. '08 330

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:05 pm
by libratune
Have you had a chance to play them? That would be the decider for me. Market values are probably similar, recent FG 330s are readily available. The 360 JG 86 a bit more rare.

You won't have to "cut into" either guitar to substitute toasters. The footprint of both PUs is the same. I do think hi-gains are a good choice for Rick 6-strings, scatterwound toasters for 12-strings.

EDIT: Or you can leave the hi-gain at bridge position, put a toaster in at neck. See discussion at: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=407135

I would go with the 360, but play them (if possible) and then decide.

Re: '86 360 vs. '08 330

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:50 am
by jdogric12
86 no contest for me. Love those mid 80's necks. '00's... not so much.

Re: '86 360 vs. '08 330

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:27 am
by pocaloc
I can't play them. I haven't seen a Rickenbacker in Spokane, ever. I've never seen one advertised on craigslist, other than my 330 in '08. :D

So the mid 80's guitars have nice necks, huh? Interesting. Definitely leaning towards that.

Re: '86 360 vs. '08 330

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:25 pm
by jdogric12
Yes, much slimmer and comfortable if you like that sort of thing.