Page 1 of 1
To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:25 pm
by MikeZito
There is currently a 1976 3001 at Guitar Center. $999, non-original HSC (a Fender case, actually) - and I'm REALLY considering it. Any words of wisdom from previous 3001 players?
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:26 pm
by sloop_john_b
HEAVY.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:38 pm
by MikeZito
I am not easily frightened by 'heavy' . . . I used to play an original 1978 Music Man Stingray! (laugh)
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:00 pm
by jdogric12
I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:16 pm
by daveman
jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I don't buy instruments as investments. I buy them to play. I have a 3001 and I play it out all the time. Sure, it's pretty heavy. Has an AMAZING neck, action as low as you like, and sounds great. My 2 cents.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 5:12 pm
by rickyfricky
Heavy for sure -- but worth the weight!

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 3:25 am
by Chris P
I had a 3001 and two 3000s. Can't really remember them being that heavy. No lightweights, but not that heavy.
Very nice basses. Nice players. I liked the 3000 better. More of a special sound. The 3001 is very Rick-ish, with sometimes a bit of P.
I believe there's one for sale on bassoutpost.com too.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 4:12 am
by kiramdear
Good, solid, player's bass, if that's what you're after.

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:16 am
by Colonel Sanders
jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.
To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:46 am
by jdogric12
Colonel Sanders wrote:jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.
To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
I have a 2030GF that might change your mind - it did mine!
OP, go for it!
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:05 am
by jps
jdogric12 wrote:Colonel Sanders wrote:jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.
To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
I have a 2030GF that might change your mind - it did mine!

I'll pile on here! Love my 2030GF.

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:07 pm
by bartyclue
Great underated bass. I love mine and play it all the time. I doubt you will be disappointed.
Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:00 pm
by woodyng
A 3001 for under $1k does not seem like that bad of a deal to me,if the bass is in nice shape. It's not my cuppa Ricjoe,(too bulky) but i think they have a great sound. I like the pickup and the tone circuit on them,and the necks are nice,too.